joshua segal
Well-known member
Update: Opening postponed to Tuesday, PM. If anyone is planning to go, double check with them first.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I'm just going to say this, NWS or not. Where are their data points to base off of? I do not believe the NWS has a high elevation weather station in the middle of VT. Without data to put into computer models, temp forecasts are a crap shoot. That is why I lean towards the mount Washington observatory high peaks forecast and adjust a bit for K's slightly reduced elevation and Latitude.
Just saying...
Update: Opening postponed to Tuesday, PM. If anyone is planning to go, double check with them first.
I can't remember if they do anything else at North Ridge before.
I'm just going to say this, NWS or not. Where are their data points to base off of? I do not believe the NWS has a high elevation weather station in the middle of VT. Without data to put into computer models, temp forecasts are a crap shoot. That is why I lean towards the mount Washington observatory high peaks forecast and adjust a bit for K's slightly reduced elevation and Latitude.
Just saying...
Well they do have Mt Mansfield as an official NWS reporting station. There are also a number of other stations that you can access via WeatherUnderground, including Stratton Summit and another at 2500'. I am sure there are others throughout VT at elevation, and I bet NWS uses them. But of course the age old way to determine atmospheric conditions at various elevations - key to weather forecasting everywhere - are the weather balloons that are launched from thousands of locations on a regular basis.
But of course they get things wrong, and in this case literally a degree or two can make all the difference. Yeggous' skepticism was warranted. Where's he getting his data from?
I try to stay quiet in most weather discussions.
How come? Please reconsider!
How come? Please reconsider!
Well they do have Mt Mansfield as an official NWS reporting station. There are also a number of other stations that you can access via WeatherUnderground, including Stratton Summit and another at 2500'. I am sure there are others throughout VT at elevation, and I bet NWS uses them. But of course the age old way to determine atmospheric conditions at various elevations - key to weather forecasting everywhere - are the weather balloons that are launched from thousands of locations on a regular basis.
But of course they get things wrong, and in this case literally a degree or two can make all the difference. Yeggous' skepticism was warranted. Where's he getting his data from?
Because up until last year or so ago the weather forum had too many people who knew too little who would debate people who actually knew about weather until it was a pointless pissing match. That scared most of the qualified people away and has left the forum a place of speculation and model regurgitation. So by that point there were threads upon threads of storms that were one-run wonders...which further pissed off people...so the mods stepped in and took control...and there were arguments about what the "rules" for the weather forum should look like and all that.
That and the climate change arguments.
Essentially, go back a few years in the weather forum and you'll see why it would be a terrible idea for this forum to have a politics section. BTW, I'm not at all qualified to talk about weather but I do enjoy the speculation and have learned a lot over the past few years.
I figured Mansfield had a station, didn't know about Stratton. Mount Washington observatory is not just the forecasts for me, all the data points they have. The auto road elevation stations data points are great, especially to see if inversions are at play. It's a great snapshot and better than wx balloons in my opinion (any station at elevation is) when you are examining weather at altitude in proximity to terrain.
Good call today. Very surprised the guns stayed on all day. SR failed to start making til tonight as well, so the weakened cold persisted well north as well.
The thing is most people on this forum are anonymous and we have little information about there backgrounds. How many people would actually know the Yeggous understands weather any better than Los unless they read Yeggous's post from earlier.Because up until last year or so ago the weather forum had too many people who knew too little who would debate people who actually knew about weather until it was a pointless pissing match.
What do you think about the link I posted yeggous. Legit or quit?
Because up until last year or so ago the weather forum had too many people who knew too little who would debate people who actually knew about weather until it was a pointless pissing match. That scared most of the qualified people away and has left the forum a place of speculation and model regurgitation. So by that point there were threads upon threads of storms that were one-run wonders...which further pissed off people...so the mods stepped in and took control...and there were arguments about what the "rules" for the weather forum should look like and all that.
That and the climate change arguments.
Essentially, go back a few years in the weather forum and you'll see why it would be a terrible idea for this forum to have a politics section. BTW, I'm not at all qualified to talk about weather but I do enjoy the speculation and have learned a lot over the past few years.
you can figure out pretty quick who has meteorology experience and who's just shitposting snow stoke screenshots... ime