drjeff
Well-known member
I don't know about that. As a powder hound myself, I am always trying to analyze mountains for the best snowfall in various storms. If choosing between the two based on natural snow only, I would choose Bush nine times out of ten (occasionally, Killington does line up with something that hits them with more snow than Bush). Bush has a lot of skiing at elevation where the snow is deepest and they get a good amount of lift whereas I just don't see K getting the same type of lift and not much of their terrain is way up off the summit (and the trails that do come off the summit are not their best whereas a lot of Bush's best stuff is up high). Add in opportunities to escape the crowds which can preserve natural snow and OB/off map, and I think Bush is hands down a better powder mountain than Killington in every way. I don't have the total averages but I read enough reports and can read between the lines enough that I see a lot of times when Bush skiers report epicness when K is merely really good.
With all due respect to the Killington breathern here and there TR enthusiasm - I seriously wonder if some of the difference between the "epic" Bush pow day TR's and the merely "really good" K pow day TR's has to do more with the standards and expectations of the "average" K local/diehard vs those of the "average" Bush local/diehard - since those there is usually quite a difference between those two types of people