Interesting op ed with some interesting comments below it on MRG:
http://www.powdermag.com/stories/end-snow-separatism/
http://www.powdermag.com/stories/end-snow-separatism/
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Interesting op ed with some interesting comments below it on MRG:
http://www.powdermag.com/stories/end-snow-separatism/
What did you find interesting about it? To me it seemed like a rehash of the same old story with absolutely no new perspective or information. Same for the comments.
Is that something you've felt like you had to do in the past? If so why? Whose business is it where you ski?
They're still going.....
Mmmm...they make sense until they talk about discrimination. At that point it sounds like BS. What a waste of energy on both sides.
His argument that only 3 ski areas out of 700+ ban snowboards cuts both ways.
I have a question. Why have'nt any resorts gone snowboard only?
I mean the obvious answer is that revenues would decline and it wouldn't be profitable. But you'd have to think if there area areas like Alta that decide that being skier-only is in their best interest, why haven't any resorts gone the other way and decided that boarder-only is in their best interest?
Who knows. It might be a surprise hit.
I have a question. Why have'nt any resorts gone snowboard only?
I mean the obvious answer is that revenues would decline and it wouldn't be profitable. But you'd have to think if there area areas like Alta that decide that being skier-only is in their best interest, why haven't any resorts gone the other way and decided that boarder-only is in their best interest?
Who knows. It might be a surprise hit.
I have a question. Why have'nt any resorts gone snowboard only?
I mean the obvious answer is that revenues would decline and it wouldn't be profitable. But you'd have to think if there area areas like Alta that decide that being skier-only is in their best interest, why haven't any resorts gone the other way and decided that boarder-only is in their best interest?
Who knows. It might be a surprise hit.
The lawsuit filed against us because we are a skier’s mountain is slowly grinding its way through the legal process and the lawyers’ offices.
Thank you for skiing with us last winter and have a great summer.
Alta only made this comment regarding the suit in their latest blog post:
http://www.alta.com/altablog/?p=2341
An interesting segment from KUER regarding the matter.
http://radiowest.kuer.org/post/skiers-snowboarders-and-fight-over-alta