The rich and their toys.
A first world issue I could not care any less about.
A first world issue I could not care any less about.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
There seems to be some schadenfreude going on here. At the end of the day these are skiers and this is a ski area. I don't like to see skiers lose money and I don't like to see ski areas close. The health of our hobby and how skiers are treated is more important to me than one's financial status.
There seems to be some schadenfreude going on here. At the end of the day these are skiers and this is a ski area. I don't like to see skiers lose money and I don't like to see ski areas close. The health of our hobby and how skiers are treated is more important to me than one's financial status.
There seems to be some schadenfreude going on here. At the end of the day these are skiers and this is a ski area. I don't like to see skiers lose money and I don't like to see ski areas close. The health of our hobby and how skiers are treated is more important to me than one's financial status.
There is, as the article alluded to, a bunch of real estate development waiting to come on the market for members soon as well as the actual development of their base area hotel/condos which will provide a bunch of capital to the club.
I'm sure this was directed at me. I don't like to see skiers lose $ either - but "skiers" that lose thousands and thousands of dollars on a piss poor investment?
As I recall, and it has been about 2 years since I read the exact details in the press release, the "hotel" is much more like an ASC style fractional ownership condo intended for members use, than an actual for the general public hotel. In it's initial presale "event" if I recall correctly, the members bought out all of the available units in one evening.can hotel guests and the lowly condo users ski at the ski area and use the lodge? If not why stay there?
As I said before, they put a bubble 6 in, which they acknowledge is way more capacity than they need, because their members wanted it, and it's a selling point as well. As I recall, one of their ads talked about the ability to get 35 runs in on any given day. 6 minute lift rides with probably not more than a 2 to 4 chair wait on a holiday weekend Saturday certainly has some appeal to those willing to pony up the coin to do so....Or me.
A little place like Haystack has no need for a bubble 6 pack is all I'm saying. Especially if it is to remain private. What could the justification possibly be?
Way overdone.
Haystack will always be a private ski area. When it was sold by Mount Snow, one condition on the sale was it could never be open to the public. The agreement only allows up to 250 tickets to be sold to local residents per day, which I don't think Hermitage every uses.