sledhaulingmedic
New member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2004
- Messages
- 1,425
- Points
- 0
Possibly true. But you have to realize also, that a LOT of ski patrollers are volunteers, not paid employees.
Although Workers' Comp laws vary by state, the volunteer patroller is an "Agent of the Corporation" in most instances. There have been several cases where volunteer patrollers were injured and the mountain was held liable. The old days of the Patrol being a separate entity is long gone. The mountain management absolutely has the right to dictate appropriate Personal Protective Equipment.
I've worn a helmet for over ten years now. I do believe patrollers should set a good example, as well as take any available steps to protect themselves. I do prefer that personal choice not be infringed, so I did vote no. That being said, I do believe helmets are a good idea.
Police, EMS and Fire are currently dealing with the new requirement to wear High Visibility Work Wear on Federally funded Highways. Sounds like a good idea, right? First incarnation of the Federal Reg required a vest so large, it covered the cops' gun belts. Not really an increase in safety there. Now, our Fire Department has to put on the High Vis vest over our Turnout coat, but only if we're not actively involved in Firefighting. Then as soon as we're done, we need to put it on. It was all well intended, it just was not very well thought out.
Just curious, GSS: If all the patrollers at Blue are like those Ski Nazi's on the Ski Patrol show, don't you think they'd be safer with sparring helmets? (Some of that non-sense made me embarrassed to admit I'm a patroller)