• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Spillway Reopens on Sugarloaf and Replacement Plans

JPTracker

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
428
Points
18
Location
MA
Curious about why they went to fixed-grip with conveyor vs. detachable. Is the fixed grip faster / slower than detachable and other benefits.

Fixed grip can run when you have icing. Detachables can not because the grips can slid.
 

ceo

Active member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
398
Points
28
Detachable lifts aren't any more prone to being blown off the cable than are fixed grips, The nut on a fixed grip actually compresses a spring that provides the grip force, and the spring force on a detachable is the same. I think Sugarloaf's reasons for going with a fixie with a conveyor had more to do with capital and maintenance costs.

EDIT: Forgot about the icing issue. Thanks, JPTracker.
 

Nick

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Nov 12, 2010
Messages
13,178
Points
48
Location
Bradenton, FL
Website
www.alpinezone.com
Couple reasons. First, the resorts have to be concerned about the chairs coming off the line in the terminals so the wind might impact that (as well as icing). Second, and related, the grips on an HSQ release and aren't fixed to the line. Technology is such that now the grips require a lot of force to come off the line, but older models (think Yan) were based on gravity to help hold them shut. Still, I think there is some risk that chairs could come off in high winds. Again, that would be pretty extreme, but it has happened.

How do they actually grip? Is it basically when it is hanging on the line it pinches on, and when it enters the station it lifts it up which releases the pinch on the line? I've always wondered exactly how they work.
 

Skimaine

New member
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
636
Points
0
Location
Maine
. . I think Sugarloaf's reasons for going with a fixie with a conveyor had more to do with capital and maintenance costs.

EDIT: Forgot about the icing issue. Thanks, JPTracker.

Right. I think cost was probably the biggest factor. I would toss a few other contributing items in. They want this lift to be bomb proof (i.e., wind proof) therefore the chairs are heavier and haul rope is heavier and the fixed grip has more chairs closer together (again more weight). I also think the fixed grip provides all the skiers that the trails served by this lift can handle.
 

ceo

Active member
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
398
Points
28
If you look at the grip, there's the rollers that it runs on in the station, and a spring-loaded lever of some kind, usually at the end away from the cable. When the chair comes into the station, a slanted rail pushes down on the lever and that opens the grip, and the cable is guided downwards away from it. Some grips (Doppelmayr) have a stable open position and stay open going around the track, others (Poma) have a single position and close again. After loading, the chair is sped up by faster-moving rollers until it reaches line speed, then another slanted rail opens the grip and closes it on the cable (or just closes it, on two-position grips), and off it goes.

The old Sugarloaf and Loon gondolas did work by gravity, but not the way I always assumed. There's a sliding gate with a diagonal slot, and the weight of the carrier on a pin in the slot pulls it sideways and that pulls on the grip jaw. There's an additional small set of rollers that lifts up the carrier when it comes into the station to release the grip. On exit, the carrier just plonks onto the cable and gravity does the rest. The Yan grips were spring-loaded but had a gravity component as well, basically just a V-shaped slot that rested on the cable.
 

Telemechanic

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
218
Points
16
Detachable lifts aren't any more prone to being blown off the cable than are fixed grips, The nut on a fixed grip actually compresses a spring that provides the grip force, and the spring force on a detachable is the same. I think Sugarloaf's reasons for going with a fixie with a conveyor had more to do with capital and maintenance costs.

EDIT: Forgot about the icing issue. Thanks, JPTracker.

Ceo got it right, spring force is spring force and Sugarloaf will save money in the long run with a fixed grip and still get high uphill capacity and a reasonable ride time.

Line speed is the big problem with running detachables in high wind. Often slowing the lift helps.

Ice on the line: I've seen a haul rope covered with an inch and a half of ice and the problem wasn't the grip sliding on the rope, the problem is cleaning the ice from the grips. The ice is easily cleaned from the rope by the bullwheel and to a lesser extent towers with depression or compression assemblies. The grips must be clean just so they will pass through all the safety grip gauges in the terminal. These devices gauge the profile of the attached grip, open grip and location of the operating roller making sure the grips are in good condition and attach to the rope properly. The added thickness of the ice causes nuisance faults of these gauges. The ice generally doesn't effect the opening and closing of the grip, the spring force is too great. Sometimes ice causes low grip force readings that improve after a revolution. These are all problems from ice built up on a stationary lift, not during operation.

Wind sometimes causes the chairs to swing while in the terminal but the risk of the grip derailing is almost nil, I've never heard of it happening. I've seen chairs swing back way beyond 45 degrees and i still think it was less stressful than four defensive linemen beginner snowboarders attempting to stand up from the chair.
 
Last edited:

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,826
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Whoa! That was fast! They are splicing the cable already.

310990_10150302744476879_61554966878_8411558_1298829885_n.jpg
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
I'd like to see pics of how the layout at the summit station has changed. Last I heard there was going to be a lot of regrading done to the area.
 

Newpylong

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
5,193
Points
113
Location
Upper Valley, NH
Are the double runners Borvig as well? If they are replacing Spillway now do you think they will replace those with another fixed grip quad possibly?
 

speden

Active member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
913
Points
28
Sugarloafers might be interested in the Sugarloaf 2011 annual meeting video:

http://www.wskitv.com/2011/10/10/sugarloaf-annual-meeting-2011-2012-season/

They talk a little bit about future lift plans. After Skyline, it sounds like next in line is a wind resistant summit T-bar, and then a detached quad King Pine replacement (starting 1000 feet lower than the current one to better serve Brackett), with the current King Pine lift moved over to replace double runner with new wind fencing (probably two years out). No talk of replacing Timberline other than adding more wind fencing to it.

They seem to be turning some good revenue up there, so hopefully the improvements will keep coming.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
After Skyline, it sounds like next in line is a wind resistant summit T-bar, and then a detached quad King Pine replacement (starting 1000 feet lower than the current one to better serve Brackett),

So I don't have to watch the vid, did they say where the T-bar would go?
 

speden

Active member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
913
Points
28
They talk about future lifts at about 26:45 in the video.

The picture is kind of blurry, but the summit T-bar they are thinking of looks to be in the area of Tote Road Ext./Narrow Guage Ext. He said there used to be a T-bar there back in the Gondola days, called something like the Stably T-bar. So I guess it would be pretty close to the unloading area for Skyline.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
They talk about future lifts at about 26:45 in the video.

The picture is kind of blurry, but the summit T-bar they are thinking of looks to be in the area of Tote Road Ext./Narrow Guage Ext. He said there used to be a T-bar there back in the Gondola days, called something like the Stably T-bar. So I guess it would be pretty close to the unloading area for Skyline.

I don't remember exactly where the old one started, but it ended right where Timberline does now.
 
Top