Tin Woodsman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2004
- Messages
- 1,127
- Points
- 63
I think we are talking past each other here - you have mischaracterized my thesis.Here's what you're missing: new investors want more than a sleepy de-risked season pass printing machine. They want it to grow, and a business that isn't taking share isn't a good growth story. They need to be sold on growing a combination of skiers, rev/skier and ancillary revs from real estate, etc. I suspect further acquisitions was likely part of the story, too (see Basin, A for example).
So your thesis is that locals are the main driver of growth, not the enthusiasts (like here) or affluent Northeasterners (you'd think the ski market were a pure duopoly if you listened to the network compared of 30 something's with disposable income). I certainly agree that's been a force in UT and the front range, but it certainly feels like there's been a huge uptick in destination travel to be laid at the feet of EPKON in the last decade. Day trippers aren't a sexy growth story for the stock/CV either. It's part of the mosaic, but the massive shock to the way people in the wealth/population centers back east are the big tickets.
Good for you - hope you've been well.Good luck and have fun with the storm!
As mentioned, there's massive anecdotal evidence that more than a wave of UT transplants are to blame (Jackson Hole and Aspen as other examples). Prevailing sentiment is that EPKON is to blame. This was a nod to your well executed sleight of hand to demand burden of proof from your interlocutor when you're the one bucking conventional wisdom (while lappearing to knowing full well the data you ask for isn't really available).
I'm pushing back solely on the confident declarations (from others) that current crowding is all/mostly about EPKON As already mentioned, EPKON is surely a major factor here. Possibly even the biggest. Not sure anyone could know this empirically outside in - the data isn't available.
But a lot of this noise is coming from recent transplants to the very same hot spots people are complaining about most. How convenient for them to blame billion dollar corporations for the very same conditions they themselves are contributing to. You don't get to blame "the corporations" while contributing to the very same crowding issues you deride. Don't like it? Move anew to somewhere else, just like you did when you bailed on the East Coast.