jimmywilson69
Well-known member
yeah He's a tool...
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
When I saw the "headline" I thought maybe there was something I missed. Then I read his "logic" lolThe guy puts it out there like it’s a fact, yet not publicly known. When in actuality it’s a guess, based a few facts combined with little knowledge of the hill in question (or of the approval process).
The bottom terminal needs to move up Ripcord from its current location so the corral can work better.Mr Skiology know-it-all "broke" the news on FB that Sugarbush is adding snowmaking to Reverse Traverse and plans to replace HG next year. He claims these have not yet been announced by Sugarbush (false at least on the Reverse Traverse part for sure as that was announced in May by John Hammond).
He also apparently thinks SB will move the base of HG down to the bottom of Lower DS by the entrance to CR because "the only way that Reverse Traverse can get to Heaven's Gate is to extend that lift down to where Castle Rock's bottom terminal is, and they do line up pretty nicely!" I guess he's never looked at a trail map of SB and hasn't seen the actual proposed plans for the RT/HGT project which would clearly show the snow-making being added to HGT with no change in alignment to that part. I see absolutely no value in extending HG that much further downhill. It would just make a longer ride time and serve no additional useful terrain. You'd also have to clear quite a bit of space to make a new base terminal and loading area. I think he's wrong on that assumption...
I'd be fine with it being moved up slightly. Although I also think the corral this past season worked pretty well most days once they figured out the optimal configuration unless it was extremely crowded.The bottom terminal needs to move up Ripcord from its current location so the corral can work better.
Glad I have not met/followed this fellow. Sounds like we would be oil and water haha.
FWIW LiftBlog is also listing HG as a likely replacement in 2023. That’s all they say.Mr Skiology know-it-all "broke" the news on FB that Sugarbush is adding snowmaking to Reverse Traverse and plans to replace HG next year. He claims these have not yet been announced by Sugarbush (false at least on the Reverse Traverse part for sure as that was announced in May by John Hammond).
He also apparently thinks SB will move the base of HG down to the bottom of Lower DS by the entrance to CR because "the only way that Reverse Traverse can get to Heaven's Gate is to extend that lift down to where Castle Rock's bottom terminal is, and they do line up pretty nicely!" I guess he's never looked at a trail map of SB and hasn't seen the actual proposed plans for the RT/HGT project which would clearly show the snow-making being added to HGT with no change in alignment to that part. I see absolutely no value in extending HG that much further downhill. It would just make a longer ride time and serve no additional useful terrain. You'd also have to clear quite a bit of space to make a new base terminal and loading area. I think he's wrong on that assumption...
I'm surprised he hasn't banned me yet. I think the only comments I've ever made have been "corrections" to his posts. I do try to do it in a very factual way for the most part though.Well, he has a tendency to ban people who challenge his "expertise", so your relationship would be short lived. Haha
That's been the going assumption for a while based on the SOPA filing with the USFS that was made back in March or April. Maybe like Hawk said more details will be announced this weekend at the Community Day speech (I won't be there though).FWIW LiftBlog is also listing HG as a likely replacement in 2023. That’s all they say.
Unfortunately Ikon is private and doesn’t reports such stats. Need an insider *wink wink* to provide some color on local sales activity that Sugarbush saw vs prior years.Curious if there's an uptick in Sugarbush pass sales to Stowe refugees; Vermont resident, non-locals such as Burlington, Shelburne, Montpelier, etc. Stowe put their new $450 parking passes for sale yesterday and they sold out. The pass does not guarantee a space either. Parking without a pass will be $30 on weekends for those with less than 4 passengers. Adult passes at MRG sold out quickly as well.
On first day of sales, Stowe parking pass plan gets chilly reception
Curious if there's an uptick in Sugarbush pass sales to Stowe refugees; Vermont resident, non-locals such as Burlington, Shelburne, Montpelier, etc. Stowe put their new $450 parking passes for sale yesterday and they sold out. The pass does not guarantee a space either. Parking without a pass will be $30 on weekends for those with less than 4 passengers. Adult passes at MRG sold out quickly as well.
On first day of sales, Stowe parking pass plan gets chilly reception
non scientific, but skiology dork did a poll of his membership which did show defection from epic to ikon. that's a very self selected group of internet dorks tho. that being said, i wouldn't pay vail to keep fucking my ass raw year after year.
we also have the world returning to a more normalish status. lots of people are back in offices part time. the full time remote work fuck off to a ski town all winter long crowd is probably smaller and will continue to get smaller as more companies put their expensive office leases back to work. so I'm hoping that post-covid overall crowds in general are just lower