Hawk
Well-known member
So if you look at the terrain up there and you keep the lift in the same alignment, There is not a whole lot of up hill you can move it. Take a look the next time you are up there. They would have to blast out, fill, cut trees and move tons of rock and dirt. As CD states, that would open them up to much more exposure to the wind. I think they will just build up some fill and take the curse out of that climb. I think that is all they can do without a major disrution to the top. You also have to consider that the long trail is right behind there and I know for certain they can not affect that in any way.It depends...would moving it uphill make it more exposed and more prone to wind holds? If so, that's a reason to not move it. Would moving it uphill more change the alignment to the point where a lot more trees would need to be cut? If so, that's again another reason not to change it. Keep in mind that the lift goes in a straight line from bottom to top. So moving the top further looker's left has a much bigger impact on tree clearing compared to just using the existing line and only cutting to meet current state clearance requirements.
The description in the USFS documents very specifically states there is no change to the alignment other than a slight deviation at the base to make more room for loading. There's no mention of any top alignment change. The USFS document does say they can't cut trees over 4" between June 1 and July 31 to minimize impact on the northern long-eared bat. So the previous reference to a bat was accurate. Although they also can't cut trees above 2500' between June 1 and August 31 due to Bicknell's Thrush... So the bat thing is almost irrelevant due to the overlap with Bicknell's Thrush.
I'm sure they could revise the USFS filing, but I'm not sure I personally see the value in changing the top alignment.