doublediamond
Active member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2013
- Messages
- 547
- Points
- 43
This is totally false. Low-e guns are completely ineffective in marginal temps.
They're "ineffective" because they put out so little per gun. You double or more up, you match the output of other guns. 2 of these SnowLogics match one modern HKD tower while using less air. 2 modern HKD towers matches the K3000 or Ratnik Snow Giant II while using less air.
If you're so smart, you tell me the flow characteristics of the SnowLogic 4-step ground gun with an 8 cfm nucleating nozzle.
Look at Loon. 100% low-E snowguns for early season snowmaking. They're kicking a lot of butt. They more or less doubled their hydrants with their snowmaking upgrades a couple years ago.
Look at Wildcat. 100% low-E guns on Lynx. They were the first to have a 2000 vertical ft trail. About half of their guns on Lynx are these SnowLogics.
Look at Sunday River. 100% low-E guns on T2. They match or beat Killington. 30-ft hydrant spacing just like Killington up around the Ridge Triple.
The only time they are "ineffective" is if it's over 28F WB. In that case no one anywhere in New England will be making snow because these air-hogs have just gotten far too expensive with high energy costs these days.
The new Ratnik ground guns they got can go up to 31F WB, with an air-water ratio of only about 14:1 at that temperature. Here's the flow curves for the Ratnik Snow Giant II. The Baby Snow Giant X-2 which is what Killington has, is "40% or more efficient."
Last edited: