• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

What if Super Combined was say.....Moguls and GS or Super G.....

Who would be King of the Hill?


  • Total voters
    15

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,748
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I agree that many bump skiers (not all) aren't that adept at carving. In this format they would probably do a bit better with the Super G than the GS for sure.
 

Domeskier

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
2,278
Points
63
Location
New York
Sundown's "King of the Mountain" race includes gates, big air and bumps. Usually they seed the bumps the night before, so they are more like gates than actual bumps, however.
 

Abubob

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
3,607
Points
63
Location
Alexandria, NH
Website
tee.pub
My feeling is that a racer that excels at Giant Slalom doesn't do as well in the tighter Slalom courses and visa versa. I mean could you see Bode Miller in the bumps? Not likely.
 

Domeskier

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
2,278
Points
63
Location
New York
I mean could you see Bode Miller in the bumps?

Would he be sporting the spandex suit? With feet shoulder-width apart? And body-conforming poles tucked pointlessly beneath his arms? I can see it all too clearly.
 

MadMadWorld

Active member
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
4,082
Points
38
Location
Leominster, MA
maybe

He throws a pretty good helicopter


I could see it. He is just an athletic dude with amazing balance. Have you guys seen the video where he loses a ski at the beginning of the race and skis the whole thing on 1 ski. He was consistently skiing the 30 mph the whole time while staying on course. Amazing
 

Savemeasammy

New member
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
2,538
Points
0
Location
S. NH
Bump skiers can't carve to save their lives....and then try to make it through gates...? HAHAHHAAA.

As an ex racer, I don't really like to ski bumps, but I certainly can ski them pretty well.

Bump SKIS aren't much for carving, but I don't see why bump SKIERS can't carve?!

Who cares about carving, anyway? ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,545
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
My feeling is that a racer that excels at Giant Slalom doesn't do as well in the tighter Slalom courses and visa versa. I mean could you see Bode Miller in the bumps? Not likely.

Most racers, even speed event specialists, have spent a bunch of time also training slalom. Case in point, Julia Mancuso in her Bronze medal winning super combined effort earlier this week. Did she have the greatest slalom technique? Compared to some of the other women who train/race a bunch more slalom, no. But was she still able to make some good short radius turns on a course that was quite rutted and covered in a mix of variable firmness/frozenness/softness, yup.

I agree with Highwaystar's statement. From the racer perspective, may a racer's bump technique be as smooth and fluid as a bump specialists in the bumps? Nope But I bet that the racer would have an easier adaptation to bumps (as they've spent tons on hours training in rutted, nasty courses over the years) than the bump skier adapting to a WC level, prepared race course
 

Domeskier

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
2,278
Points
63
Location
New York
Nope But I bet that the racer would have an easier adaptation to bumps (as they've spent tons on hours training in rutted, nasty courses over the years) than the bump skier adapting to a WC level, prepared race course

I think a groomer is a lot closed to a WC level race course than a rutted slalom run is to a WC bump run.
 

Domeskier

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
2,278
Points
63
Location
New York
WC runs are salted to produce hard as nails runs are they not? Not like most groomers ... some ... not most. :wink:

The technique for skiing both is pretty much the same, though. The technique for skiing a WC bump run is radically different from the technique for skiing a rutted up slalom course. If you can carve up an icy, skied-off expert groomer, which I assume most WC bump skiers can do, the switch to a WC race course is not going to be as extreme as the swtich from a rutted up slalom course to an icy WC bump run.
 

KevinF

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2003
Messages
568
Points
18
Location
Marlborough, Massachusetts
The only ski racing discipline that I know of that involves intentional air time is downhill. This is what DH'er did during this training run:
1537613_584487481634380_241059741_o.jpg

This is a picture of the men's DH course:
1011680_10203198076501436_937985430_n.jpg

Most people would immediately fall on their ass on ice like that and slide to the bottom.

A racer who makes all the gates wouldn't have to to ski the bump run very quickly, because I'm guessing no bumper could finish the race course.

Now, if you want to talk about racers vs. bumpers on "normal" groomers vs. "normal" bump runs -- then you have an interesting debate.
 

Savemeasammy

New member
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
2,538
Points
0
Location
S. NH
You also need to consider the equipment. My mogul skis have beveled edges, and are soft in the tips to boot. If I tried to set an edge on that course, I would almost certainly wipe out. It is also likely that I would crash into the woods. I might even sustain a life-threatening injury!

The downhiller might suffer a similar fate if he/she ventured into the bumps with their long, stiff skis and razor-sharp edges!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

andrec10

Active member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
2,240
Points
38
Location
Hyde Park, NY...Hunter on Weekends in the Winter..
I'd say the opposite. I've skied with a lot of elite level former Division 1 collegiate racers that don't ski bumps well at all; can't hold a line a high rate of speed and certainly don't know what to do in the air. On the other hand, I've never skied with an elite level bump skier who can't rip groomers well.

and to your first point Dr. Jeff, skiercross is far closer to racing than it is bumps and I'd be willing to bet a higher percentage of the big mountain skiing competitors come from a bump/freestyle background than they do a race background. I know Darren Ralves did well big mountain skiing post racing career, but I'd say he's more the exception than the norm.

It's an interesting debate and I'd love to see it settled someday at the WC level. I've always tried to excel at both styles of skiing (even though my racing career lasted all of 5 weeks). I'm far more a bumper / off piste skier at heart, but being able to carve up groomed terrain at a high level has always been something I've strived to do well also.


Put the bumpers on a ICY GS course and watch them SH!T their pants.
 

Scruffy

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
1,157
Points
38
Location
In the shadow of the moon.
All you people thinking that all mountain carving skills equate to WC GS skills are way out to lunch. As an ex racer I can assure you your all mountain carving - even icy expert terrain - is not even the tip of the ice berg of the skill set needed to excel in a race course.

I don't know who would win in this hypothetical argument, a lot would depend on the participants, I don't think you can generalize. I know excellent racers that can shred a bump run too - so it all depends. It's true that the closer you get from beer league to WC, the more intensely directed the training is toward the disciplines; so each would suffer dearly in their foreign course.

At any rate, I'm sure it would be hilarious to watch.
 
Top