Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Both over groomed and boring. But Whiteface has more angle.
:-o
Everybody, duck for cover!
:smash: :uzi: :flame:
:lol:
Hey Mods --------------------troll Alert !!!
Never skied it, though it does look like a sick mountain. That said, this wouldn't be the first time I've heard complaints about too much grooming and not letting enough of their terrain bump up.
Both over groomed and boring. But Whiteface has more angle.
I agree..Stowe and Sugarbush blow both mountains away
Fine with me if you think that, but didn't I finally get you to admit that you never skied WF? I know I remember a post where you didn't know that the Summit chair go to the actual summit of WF. I don't know how anyone could ski there and not know that.
Stick to what you’re good at, counting stuff. From a post you once made describing yourself maybe it would be a good idea if you start counting calories.
Uh oh. GSS comparing mountains, when he hasn't skied one of them. Remind you of a previous thread where you ripped me a new a-hole for suggesting that the Bush was better than Stowe, when I hadn't skied Stowe????
GSS... tisk tisk tisk. Bad boy. :wink:
No I skied Whiteface in 1994 and 1997....it's fun for alot of vert and cruising but they lack in snowfall and natural snow terrain..
Hey hpd,2. The natural snow terrain in the picture is the Slides, there is nothing lift serviced that can compare to in in the East. Yeah I know it's usually only open in March and April.