AdironRider
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,844
- Points
- 83
So the other thread turned into more of a pissing match than anything, but I think this is a question that got overlooked and hasnt been discussed in a while.
Do you think the recent development at Gore is going to be a success or failure?
Gore has been putting some serious money down on the table, and has really added to the terrain. The Burnt Ridge area and the upcoming interconnect to the Ski Bowl in North Creek coming online next year. Do you think these developments, and the connection and addition of North Creek as a true village, will bring Gore into the top 5 of the east, or at least into a true destination? Or do you think they missed the boat, with the crash of real estate and the overall economy do you think the development is going to stall out once the government work is done (ski area development) and private takes over (North Creek development condos, restaurants, shopping)?
Personally, I think that if implemented well, Gore could really have something there. There is something to be said for a real village being the base opposed to a fake reconstruction of something in the Alps. Notable examples of fake development to me are Stratton in the east and Beaver Creek in the west. North Creek certainly needs to be spruced up a bit, but the real downtown feel is there.
Gore has varied and interesting terrain, and a good layout that keeps beginners, intermediates, and experts in there own areas. Outside of the saddle, theres little I dislike about the layout of the mountain, and its variation in terrain aspects usually leaves some good snow to be found somewhere. Snowmaking is decent, but not spectacular, and the tree skiing is outstanding.
No they do not get comparable snow to Stowe, Jay or Killington, but they do get equal snow to Mt. Snow, Magic, and frankly Whiteface. Whiteface tends to get a little more, but it holds longer at Gore, I consider it a wash. Gore is closer to NYC, Albany, and all points south, and thats a large skier base to tap into.
So what say you, will the development at Gore change anything?
Do you think the recent development at Gore is going to be a success or failure?
Gore has been putting some serious money down on the table, and has really added to the terrain. The Burnt Ridge area and the upcoming interconnect to the Ski Bowl in North Creek coming online next year. Do you think these developments, and the connection and addition of North Creek as a true village, will bring Gore into the top 5 of the east, or at least into a true destination? Or do you think they missed the boat, with the crash of real estate and the overall economy do you think the development is going to stall out once the government work is done (ski area development) and private takes over (North Creek development condos, restaurants, shopping)?
Personally, I think that if implemented well, Gore could really have something there. There is something to be said for a real village being the base opposed to a fake reconstruction of something in the Alps. Notable examples of fake development to me are Stratton in the east and Beaver Creek in the west. North Creek certainly needs to be spruced up a bit, but the real downtown feel is there.
Gore has varied and interesting terrain, and a good layout that keeps beginners, intermediates, and experts in there own areas. Outside of the saddle, theres little I dislike about the layout of the mountain, and its variation in terrain aspects usually leaves some good snow to be found somewhere. Snowmaking is decent, but not spectacular, and the tree skiing is outstanding.
No they do not get comparable snow to Stowe, Jay or Killington, but they do get equal snow to Mt. Snow, Magic, and frankly Whiteface. Whiteface tends to get a little more, but it holds longer at Gore, I consider it a wash. Gore is closer to NYC, Albany, and all points south, and thats a large skier base to tap into.
So what say you, will the development at Gore change anything?