what's up highpeaksdrifter
nice to see you pop in. Hope you've had a good season at WF
nice to see you pop in. Hope you've had a good season at WF
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
In college I got my AIARE level I and II as well as WFR so I do think I can. On many occasions I have seen the Slides closed (with sufficient base) when avalanche danger is low or non-existent. It would be nice to know what their reasoning is sometimes.
This is all I ask as well. It just seems so ambiguous.
It's almost like they enjoy keeping them closed for the "mystery" or something. I'm all for safety, but it seems like they're way over cautious.
That said, I've admittedly never skied them, because they're pretty much never open. So for comparison, and to educate me on the degree of difficulty, how much more difficult are they then say, Liftline at Smuggs?
what's up highpeaksdrifter
nice to see you pop in. Hope you've had a good season at WF
what's up highpeaksdrifter
nice to see you pop in. Hope you've had a good season at WF
It's not anymore difficult and besides Slide #4 (I believe), Liftline at Smuggs is more challenging.
Well, if that's truly the case then it adds to the, "WTH are these things never open" debate.
Slope is only one variable in the 'potential danger' equation. The slides are a relatively slick rock face with lots of resurging water forming icy patches on top of the rock. There is not much vegetation to hold snow in place, compared to liftline at Stowe or Face Chutes at Jay which are full of small trees.
This is not a slope I would ever ski in the backcountry. High potential for a weak layer at the base, little to no exit route, and it is a terrain trap if you are stuck in a slide.