• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

170cm to 163cm help

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,885
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
198 on the scale this morning at the gym. 203 when I got home from the summit :beer: :lol:
 

campgottagopee

New member
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
3,771
Points
0
Location
Virgil
Some folks just like to get other opinions.

A surprising amount of good skiers know dick about the equipment they use.
This might not be the best analogy, but I guess I’m a pretty good driver, but I know dick about cars. That's why before I bought my Subie I kept buggin you Camp. :wink:

Well, there certainly are a lot of opionions around here :cool:
 

57stevey

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2004
Messages
430
Points
16
Location
NH
I am learning the hard way that it's better to buy long than short. It's a whole lot easier to gain weight to make your skis seem shorter than vice versa!
 

vonski

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2009
Messages
213
Points
0
Location
G-bury CT.
I think it is a personal preference. I have a pair of Atomic Metrons that are 150's. a pair of Rossi twin tips that are 160's, a pair of Atomic SL9's that are 160's and a pair of Rossi Sick Birds that are 178. I never skied on anything over 193 in the old days and I love my short skis. I am 5' 8" 195. The metrons are ice skates in the woods with quick turning radius and fun as hell on packed powder woods days. The twin tips at 160 are my all around skis and carry me on pow just fine and work well in the bumps. The SL9's devoure the hard pack and make those refreeze days a blast. The 178 Sick birds eat up the crud and deep Pow. So, quiver if you may as it is the only way to go!
 

bigbog

Active member
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Messages
4,882
Points
38
Location
Bangor and the state's woodlands
Just my $.01 thinking, but I remember demoing the Monster 78 and found it a pretty exciting ski....not in slush though. Agree with all previous....go longer for a soft snow ski(ie Recon).
 

tmcc71

New member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
180
Points
0
thanks for the advice

I'm going to spend the extra 150 on the 170's. It's a shame though, recons with bindings for 459 shipped is a smokind deal. Everyone else want close to 700.
 
Top