VTKilarney
Well-known member
This article confirms that the 70,000 skier visits that Q achieved in great snow years with ramped up marketing is definitely poor.
http://www.masslive.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2013/12/jay_peak_ski_area_hopes_to_use.html
Of particular note, is this comment about pre-Q skier visits:
“Burke has had four to five owner groups in the past few years the reason for that is they have had 70,000 to 80,000 skier visits a year and you cannot do that and be sustainable,” Toland said.
A study of the area shows it will take about 120,000 visits a year to be financially viable and Tolland said they believe a hotel and other amenities will do that.
http://www.masslive.com/entertainment/index.ssf/2013/12/jay_peak_ski_area_hopes_to_use.html
Of particular note, is this comment about pre-Q skier visits:
“Burke has had four to five owner groups in the past few years the reason for that is they have had 70,000 to 80,000 skier visits a year and you cannot do that and be sustainable,” Toland said.
A study of the area shows it will take about 120,000 visits a year to be financially viable and Tolland said they believe a hotel and other amenities will do that.
Last edited: