Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Could you tell how much damage there is above Warren's Way?
.
Sure doesn't look like they had 17 fanguns going on the training hill. According to the pictures anyhow. And by the wording of that email, it still sounds like they can't run the fans and the air/water system at the same time. Really?
TB I hate to tell you but many areas have had a hard time getting going in New England. Some may even close again after this coming weeks weather. Sugarbush has actually done a good job getting both Organgrinder & Ripcord open, not to mention top to bottom. They're probably offering the most challenging trails available in all of New England right now, takes a bit of snow to cover them. Burke is a different story, don't compare the two. You're way off base doing so.
Heard from the marketing girl at burke on Saturday, at an event hosted by the tour company I use, that they are hoping to have the hotel open by MLK.
By her presentation you would think all was perfect in Qutopia...
TB I hate to tell you but many areas have had a hard time getting going in New England. Some may even close again after this coming weeks weather. Sugarbush has actually done a good job getting both Organgrinder & Ripcord open, not to mention top to bottom. They're probably offering the most challenging trails available in all of New England right now, takes a bit of snow to cover them. Burke is a different story, don't compare the two. You're way off base doing so.
LOL
She was nice, and it certainly wasn't the forum to "blindside" her with questions about all of the issues discussed for the last139 pages.
It is ridiculous tough to listen to an adult say "QBurke" over and over during a 5 minute marketing presentation. It sounds Just as bad as it has in my head since they changed the name. It just further reinforces the pretentiousness of the Quiros clan.
1 other thing she mentioned. She made it sound like QBurke and Kingdom Trails had this awesome relationship. wasn't it completely dissolved? I'm sure this was covered on page 90 or something...
Sugarbush has increased snowmaking capacity not reduced it. They increased the diameter of piping & added new pumps to increase the amount of water they can pump up the hill. All VT. areas have reduced the amount of compressors needed by purchasing low-e guns, not just Sugarbush. Even the almighty Killington which rents most of their compressors has reduced the number of compressors they rent by about 1/3. Killington only owns a small in house electrical compressor. Most of the compressors they use are rented & are diesel powered which gives them an advantage when electrical rates skyrocket. They rent them instead of buying them because of the constant changes in regulations regarding diesel power. It's cheaper to rent them than to constantly upgrade them every year to meet new regulation standards. Jeff Temple, the head of mountain operations at Killington, discussed this on another site last year. So yes I still think you are off base comparing Burke to Sugarbush.Off base? I don't think so. Let me explain.
First, yes, weather has been a major challenge. That said, there ARE places open. My comment has to do with BOTH areas REDUCING their snowmaking capacity in recent years. The coincidence is uncanny really. Both got rid of air compressors when they built hotels. That meant that they could not put on as many guns at once when weather was favorable. Granted Burke has suffered more. Both have responded by using Low-E guns or options that require less air when the obvious solution would be to rent their compressors again.
This criticism of SB (which I love) is not new. We've talked about it a lot on SkiMRV and the SB thread, particularly in seasons where there were marginal temps at best early on. Sugarbush is just slower at responding than other resorts to which it compares itself...in particular the other "S" one up the road.
In Burke's case it is hard to know what the difference would be since they've always been conservative blowing snow. I think that they might have the Poma (barely) going if they had the same air capacity. They might not. As we've discussed there was a legitimate water shortage.
Sugarbush has increased snowmaking capacity not reduced it. They increased the diameter of piping & added new pumps to increase the amount of water they can pump up the hill. All VT. areas have reduced the amount of compressors needed by purchasing low-e guns, not just Sugarbush. Even the almighty Killington which rents most of their compressors has reduced the number of compressors they rent by about 1/3. Killington only owns a small in house electrical compressor. Most of the compressors they use are rented & are diesel powered which gives them an advantage when electrical rates skyrocket. They rent them instead of buying them because of the constant changes in regulations regarding diesel power. It's cheaper to rent them than to constantly upgrade them every year to meet new regulation standards. Jeff Temple, the head of mountain operations at Killington, discussed this on another site last year. So yes I still think you are off base comparing Burke to Sugarbush.
Sugarbush has increased snowmaking capacity not reduced it. They increased the diameter of piping & added new pumps to increase the amount of water they can pump up the hill. All VT. areas have reduced the amount of compressors needed by purchasing low-e guns, not just Sugarbush. Even the almighty Killington which rents most of their compressors has reduced the number of compressors they rent by about 1/3. Killington only owns a small in house electrical compressor. Most of the compressors they use are rented & are diesel powered which gives them an advantage when electrical rates skyrocket. They rent them instead of buying them because of the constant changes in regulations regarding diesel power. It's cheaper to rent them than to constantly upgrade them every year to meet new regulation standards. Jeff Temple, the head of mountain operations at Killington, discussed this on another site last year. So yes I still think you are off base comparing Burke to Sugarbush.
a ha! so burke, in line with peers, dropped compressors due to fan guns that no longer required them. You seem to have knowledge that others posting on here do not, who keep insisting that that the lack of compressors was in effect a reduction of capacity decision. Would appreciate any further info you have on this as it would negate at least 200 existing posts about how Burke really didnt add capacity . It would have seemed very odd to me that Burke claimed snowmaking improvements if not having additional compressors is really the linchpin of capacity. thanks.
Have they increased air capacity to where it was before 2006 or equivalent?