ss20
Well-known member
Ikon/Epic COULD also track visitor locations and penalize those who go to/from VT and then an outside state...but they don't. Should they? Paging the peanut gallery...
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
So not trying to be political but wondering if the administrations were different last February/March, do you think there would have been more of a federal plan instead of leaving it up to the individual states to make their own rules?
Initially, no.So not trying to be political but wondering if the administrations were different last February/March, do you think there would have been more of a federal plan instead of leaving it up to the individual states to make their own rules?
I remember when they first set up the EZPass system one of the conditions was that states wouldn't be allowed to use the data for issuing speeding tickets, possibly for this very reason.It's true that they did indeed TRY to make it work.
MA went as far a having their attorneys look in to it.
Came down to NOT being able to prove occupancy of said vehicle.
the federal govt completely washed their hands of the problem and pushed it on the states with no funding or coordination, causing them to competitively bid over the same resources. it was an embarrassing response. stop excusing it.
No. I think my opinions are surprisingly similar to drjeff's on this one...So not trying to be political but wondering if the administrations were different last February/March, do you think there would have been more of a federal plan instead of leaving it up to the individual states to make their own rules?
There's what....150ish countries in the world? I can only think of a half dozen that didn't completely botch their response at some point.
I'm just happy we're skiing. They're not in many European countries.
No. I think my opinions are surprisingly similar to drjeff's on this one...
I do think there are things that could have (and should have) been done differently. But I'm not convinced at all that the outcome would have been much different no matter what.
I’d go mad if not for skiing right now. I’d have to start a fight club or something.
Agreed. My one cousin that I talk to a lot pointed out recently how much my tone and mood has changed since I started skiing. I'd very much be going crazy right now if it wasn't for skiing...I’d go mad if not for skiing right now. I’d have to start a fight club or something.
Yes and no.So not trying to be political but wondering if the administrations were different last February/March, do you think there would have been more of a federal plan instead of leaving it up to the individual states to make their own rules?
So your last name is NortonI’d go mad if not for skiing right now. I’d have to start a fight club or something.
coordinating supplies, harnessing the defense production act, and promoting consistent best practices without actively undermining them, would have made a significant difference.
Heck, even many European countries didn't do much better. So I'm not entirely sure the stupidity of the former President had really hurt the situation all that much.It’s hard to blame a President for stupidity like that even if the Presidential response could have been better. At a minimum, I’d put my partisanship aside and recognize that neither side has a perfect track record.
Federalism vs. States Rights (and responsibilities).the federal govt completely washed their hands of the problem and pushed it on the states with no funding or coordination, causing them to competitively bid over the same resources. it was an embarrassing response. stop excusing it.