mondeo
New member
That is a very uninformed comment.
All the ski resorts in the ASC portfolio made an operating profit other than The Canyons when they were getting it off the ground. Sugarbush didn't and that's why they unloaded it for next to nothing. They just didn't make enough operating profit to service the gigantic interest payments on those huge 12% loans (junk bonds) Les Otten used to buy all those ski resorts. Before they started spinning off ski areas to pay down the debt, ASC was paying something approaching $100 million in interest every year. The business plan was to use the profits from real estate development to pay down the debt. Unfortunately, ASC sucked at real estate development and quarter share units at Steamboat, The Canyons, and Attitash ended up being auctioned off at fire sale prices. ASC had a finance problem with too much leverage and lousy interest rates, not an operations problem. If Les Otten hadn't retained 51% ownership of ASC when he took it public, he would have raised enough cash in the IPO to solve his debt problem. Greed and hubris killed the company.
Not necessarily arguing here, but how did POWDR finance the purchase of Killington? I'd argue there was an operations problem if they weren't making enough money to cover the loan payments; you can be making a 1% yearly ROI and claim profitability, but that isn't a good operation.
I think another thing people are forgetting is that it isn't just how much it costs to run a resort in May, but how much it costs to make enough snow to legitimately last into May. My bet is one of the big drivers in their initial statement of mid-April closing is their desire to reduce their snowmaking costs. Not being open as long as they have the snow is another issue.