highpeaksdrifter
New member
moguls created by good skiers are pretty fun though.
Please tell us the kind of moguls good skiers make v the kind bad skiers make.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
moguls created by good skiers are pretty fun though.
When I first voted in the poll, there were only 2 votes for groomed, and I think 10 for bumps. Since, we've picked up more groomed votes, but there is no doubt there are far more people skiing groomers than bump trails.
To bump or not to bump.....I did the bump in the 70's
Please tell us the kind of moguls good skiers make v the kind bad skiers make.
your kidding me right? i don't claim to be a great mogul skier but definately know the differencs between bumps that flow down the mountain ( created by good skiers or boarders) vs @#itty cross bumps that pull every way but the fall lines.
More stereotyping, but rich people tend to act more arrogant, and do dumb things because of it, "regular" people tend to stay within their abilities more, and often are nicer.
as i said, i am sure some of them are groomer lovers... never implied all rich people have no skills.
...if Bush sells one more place because a groomer lover had an awesome May day, then mission accomplished. I most certainly did not stereotype all well to do wealthy people as not having skills. I have skied with some rather well to do people that ski on par or better than I do. You over generalized my statement, big time.
The average skier is a groomer lover. I think it is fair to assume the average majority of wealthy skiers are groomer lovers too. How is identifying the average skiing population stereotyping when it is applied to a sub-categorization?
Please tell us the kind of moguls good skiers make v the kind bad skiers make.
If you had a pass at Sugarbush, this season, and you didn't get your money's worth... you did something very wrong. :roll:
I don't like this poll. The topic is half grooming bump runs, which gives a skier a choice of doing bumps or groomed. The poll makes you choose groomed or bumps, no in between. As a result I chose groomed. I have been getting more and more into bumps, however, I can not ski bumps all day. Since there was no in between, I chose groomers.
Right on there. For whatever reason, not manly enough, will be ridiculed, or not skier enough, must people do not like to admit they like groomers.
You read most of the posts in ski forums and you come away with the idea that 90% of the posters think they are expert bumpers, power hounds and tree skiers who wouldn't be caught on a groomer. In pratice I'd bet that isn't the case.
I ski on all types of terrain groomers included.
However, the above PR says "Sugarbush plans to offer expert-only skiing and riding on Stein's Run". We've had the discussion in the past whether one can truly call themself an "expert" if they can't or won't ski bumps. So the question is, should it be groomed at all?
Gee, someone may have a preference for trees and love hucking cliffs, but may not care so much for bumps and may not be great at that perfect zippeline down a bump run, does that mean that they are not experts? Or from another perspective, if one is great at bumps, but never skis trees or off piste, are they truly experts? If someone isn't doing jumps in the terrain park, are they truly experts?
Check out that linked discussion. These points have all been brought up and discussed there.
I'll be rippin' up the bumps, and I hope to see some of you out there!
Thanks, Win!
It's good to be able to please everyone.
I'll be rippin' up the bumps, and I hope to see some of you out there!
Yes sir!
Maybe I can even get some video!
And unlike andyzee, perhaps we'll see it before next season?