thorski
New member
Exactly what I was thinking.
Calling them a bunch of morons is a little harsh, IMHO.
When you factor in the drunks it's not harsh at all.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Exactly what I was thinking.
Calling them a bunch of morons is a little harsh, IMHO.
http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811386.pdf
Nope. There is no correlation between cell phone ownership and accident rates.
When you factor in the drunks it's not harsh at all.
The point is that cell phones are a substitution, not a new phenomenon. Bad drivers will be bad drivers, that hasn't changed. Just fewer people reading newspapers and eating cereal because they're on the phone instead.Sounds like a cell phone company stat mondeo..;-), ownership = no, but distraction while driving is a no brainer...
Does that mean I'm a moron for riding in the woods where bears live?
The point is that cell phones are a substitution, not a new phenomenon. Bad drivers will be bad drivers, that hasn't changed. Just fewer people reading newspapers and eating cereal because they're on the phone instead.
Not that I approve of texting while driving (don't ever do it myself), but texting is just one form of distracted driving:Texting and driving is a whole new animal. Next time you are out driving around count how many people are texting while they are driving.
The point is that cell phones are a substitution, not a new phenomenon. Bad drivers will be bad drivers, that hasn't changed. Just fewer people reading newspapers and eating cereal because they're on the phone instead.
Statistics say they're a substitution or aren't significant. People aren't going to be talking on the phone and reading a newspaper. They're talking on the phone instead of something else.Yep...are an addition to the mix...
Show me the data. It's not like texting and driving is thought to be a safe thing to do, the people that do it just think they're good enough to pull it off. How can you say those people wouldn't be reading something, changing music, programming a GPS, or something else? The key decision is not to text, it's to do something other than drive in the first place.Texting and driving is a whole new animal. Next time you are out driving around count how many people are texting while they are driving.
Show me the data. It's not like texting and driving is thought to be a safe thing to do, the people that do it just think they're good enough to pull it off. How can you say those people wouldn't be reading something, changing music, programming a GPS, or something else? The key decision is not to text, it's to do something other than drive in the first place.
Anecdotes aren't data. Perception is often different than reality.I see the data everyday when i am driving around. The people who are reading, changing music, or anything else are now also texting at the same time.
Texting is just a part of teenagers now, and their numbers on the road increase every year.
Anecdotes aren't data. Perception is often different than reality.
That's what I'm saying, and that's what the data says.So are you saying that you think people don't need to be more careful out there with all the cell phones and texting?
Those that will be stupid, will be stupid. It doesn't matter how many options you give them, or how many you take away.
That's what I'm saying, and that's what the data says.