I would respectfully disagree with this statement. While it conveniently fits the narrative, don't think for a moment that the state of Vermont actually had any significant influence on the business strategy of a multi-national semiconductor manufacturer. When business is good, things are great, downturns and a fundamental global shift in the industry are the root cause of this issue. Not even massive corporate welfare can help- ask the state of New York. They paid $400-500k per job back in the early 2000s. That worked out so well that they just shelled out another $40M to "preserve" the scraps of those very same jobs. Yes, Vermont could do more to attract business but they don't have the deep pockets that other states have for this sort of thing but given the history of some of these deals, that may not be a bad thing.
International pressures are certainly a factor. But the relationship between the State and IBM played a significant role. One example is that NY threw a lot tax incentives to IBM to expand Fishkill. Vermont? Not so much. Additionally, IBM had two big concerns--electricity and access for its employees. Electric rates (set by the State) were very high. Second, remember that project called the Circ Highway? IBM really wanted it. That project, as you know, was killed.
This is an opinion piece, but it does discuss the Circ Highway issue as well as NYS and its efforts.
https://www.benningtonbanner.com/stories/ibm-the-circ-and-ibm,223944
And yes, it can be expensive to live here but, for me, I am willing to pay that premium. Vermont is a very nice place and like most things in life, nicer stuff costs more.
This reasoning has been used for years by the left in Vermont to justify their policies. I'm interested to hear what you think this "premium" is getting you in Vermont. As someone who is native to there and grew up there, I can tell you that when I go back to visit it is really sad. The middle class is all but gone. Local organizations (one my local ski hills included) can't get enough volunteers to operate. Costs of living, high taxes, and poor job prospects leave many to move out. This is leaving a lot of poor and a few rich people in the State. It also is creating the huge demographic problem that many of us saw ten years ago or so but those in power are only now recognizing. The fact is now that the demographics of the state now make a lot of Vermont's policy decisions simply unsustainable.
Last edited: