Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
In addition, the judge ruled that agreements between the state and Jay Peak that required quarterly financial reporting, oversight, management and administration of the projects did not call for the state to conduct “any audit of the project.” “The reporting and honesty obligations fell on the Jay Peak entities,” he wrote.
In addition, the judge ruled that agreements between the state and Jay Peak that required quarterly financial reporting, oversight, management and administration of the projects did not call for the state to conduct “any audit of the project.” “The reporting and honesty obligations fell on the Jay Peak entities,” he wrote.
Congratulations Vermont!!!!
You've FINALLY done it!!!!
You are now officially the MOST corrupt state in all of America!!!:beer:
Illinois, New York, and New Jersey are really going to have to step-up their game to contend.
IMHO, this is an example of Vermont trying to play in the big leagues without having any real clue how to do so. That happens a lot in our little state.
Just so you know VT, I wasn't trying to put down Vermont with the word little. It was more to do with the GSP and population. The point I was trying to make is this event doesn't even come close to the amount of corruption that exists in a lot of other states. As far as fraud cases, it also doesn't even come close to the top ten in this country.
Certainly not something you would expect to see happen at the state level with state officials involved.Well....this did involve hundreds of millions of dollars. And state officials traveled with the presenters to Asia, allowed the State seal to be used on marketing materials, affirmatively represented that these projects WERE audited and WERE a safe investment. Do I need to continue? I think that is a big deal.
While I have not reviewed the decision and get the whole sovereign immunity issue, politically and business wise this is a HUGE eff up.
Certainly not something you would expect to see happen at the state level with state officials involved.
That might be the most egregious part because it calls into question everything which had this stamp of approval in the past.Exactly. Especially when the STATE sold folks on the idea that they were doing oversight.
Exactly. Especially when the STATE sold folks on the idea that they were doing oversight.
Allegations of kickbacks:
https://vtdigger.org/2018/07/08/lawsuit-attorneys-eb-5-investors-took-5m-kickbacks-jay-peak/
But remember, Stenger knew absolutely nothing. Right?
I think Stenger knew something wasn't adding up
So a finders fee in and of itself is not an issue in ordinary cases. The problem here though was that when investors grew concerned the lawyers who received these fees were slow to act if they acted at all. That does not look good.
It certainly isn't some smoking gun. Did you think getting EB-5 cash wasn't going to cost something even when legal?
The three plaintiffs retained Shen as their immigration attorney in 2013, 2014 and March of 2016 (just prior to the SEC crackdown), and were not made aware that Shen was also representing the interests of Stenger and Quiros.