- Joined
- Jul 1, 2001
- Messages
- 31,154
- Points
- 0
Matt's responses are in:
http://skiing.alpinezone.com/articles/challenge/2007/response.htm?resort=magic
http://skiing.alpinezone.com/articles/challenge/2007/response.htm?resort=magic
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Glad to hear the Red Chair will remain for the foreseeable future. I don't think the terrain can handle an HSQ as a Black Chair replacement. Go with an FG.
All things weighed in I would like to see a fixed grip quad with a larger than normal chair spacing.
Great answers, I like the honesty in the answers, and in their general business practices so far. I can't think of many resorts that would willingly reduce the amount of terrain they claim to be able to make snow on just to make it more accurate.
I'm looking forward to getting to ski there this year, and I hope they do well.
I think I would go for a fixed grip quad. I haven't really seen Magic at capacity so I really don't think it will make that much of a difference between a triple and a quad. People like quads now a days and I think it would make the most sense to buy quad chairs. If you want to limit capacity space the chairs further apart.
Also fixed grips are cheaper to buy and operate.
If you look at the other side of the coin though, high speed lifts tend to draw more people. Take Wildcat for example, how many people want nothing to do with the mountain if the high speed is not open? Most of us here don't mind taking the tomcat triple up, but i would say most of their clients love the base to summit high speed lift.
All things weighed in I would like to see a fixed grip quad with a larger than normal chair spacing.
Thanks. I also forgot to mention that the new trail count is 40, down from 48 or 53 (depending on which map you looked at). I am hoping to have it up by Monday. We think everyone will appreciate the simplicity and honesty.
You've got the arguement summed up pretty well. My dream is a high speed double or a nice retro gondola.
You've got the arguement summed up pretty well. My dream is a high speed double or a nice retro gondola.
I think the issue here is that the terrain can't handle a quad. Again, the issue has nothing to do with FG vs. detach. They both transport 2400pph.
I would definitely just replace it with a new FG triple. Don't want to overload that terrain... it's some truly fantastic skiing, and overpopulating it would not be good.
Overall, I'm pleased with the openness of the responses, and I think this new regime will bring about a lot of positive changes at Magic. I wish them the best!
I only know of two or three HS lifts that aren't quads or 6-packs.
really?? Where?? I didn't even think they existed. It was more of a pipe dream.
Straight answers. what a concept! Looks like the snowmaking isnt going to be significantly different from last year. Hopefully they will be able to cover all their primary areas first so that if it is a lean winter, lucifer can get some love too. If they are able to maintain a bump run, that would make magic a primary draw for me even if there hasnt been any natural snow. And that would be quite a change. I know a number of people who love the place but wouldnt touch it without a good snowfall before they go.