Just out of curiosity, what gave you the impression that Magic has so little vertical? I only ask because Magic seems to suffer from misconceptions so I thought it might be interesting to hear about what is causing those misconceptions. Not only does Magic have a lot of vertical, but it makes better use of that vertical than any other mountain under 2k in New England.
I think a lot of people just have no idea that the mountain is there, and those that do know about it think it's a small hill or just not modern enough to consider skiing there.
I have a condo at Mount Snow so I ski there almost every weekend. I buy the blackout pass and I ski other areas during the holiday blackouts.
Last year I was skiing with a bunch of other second homeowners at Mount Snow and I was talking up Magic. Most of them couldn’t understand why I wanted to ski Magic. I talked about the awesome terrain, and how I liked it better than Mt Snow. The trail layouts being “like it used to be” narrow trails more naturally cut, not large wide boulevards like some of the trails at Mount Snow. I guess several of them got sick of me talking up Magic. One guy, who’s a great skier by the way, says “I don’t understand you liking an old school mountain like Magic, today’s skis and skiing style doesn’t fit in with a mountain like Magic.” When I said “you know like the last run we took down Uncles, it’s just more challenging and fun”. Uncles by the way is one of the few narrow “old school” trails left at Mount Snow.
I couldn’t understand that a really great skier wouldn’t consider Magic, I just don’t get it but maybe there are many others that feel this way?