• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Octane Rating

What octane rating gasoline do you usually purchase?

  • 87

    Votes: 19 82.6%
  • 89

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • 93

    Votes: 2 8.7%
  • Diesel

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    23

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
Thought this might be interesting. What octane rating gasoline do you usually purchase? If you buy higher than 87, why? I suppose you might see better gas mileage. Has anyone ever calculated whether their mileage increase offsets the additional cost?
 

thebigo

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
2,111
Points
113
Location
NH seacoast
I use the cheapest stuff i can find in my car and the most expensive stuff i can find in my motorcycles. I never found a difference in a car, but in a motorcycle you can not only tell the difference between octanes but also distributors. IE: both shell and sunoco far outpreform exxon/mobil, the bikes will barely run on the generic stuff
 

Hawkshot99

Active member
Joined
Aug 16, 2006
Messages
4,489
Points
36
Location
Poughkeepsie, NY
I was always told that 93 burns faster then 87.

The higher the octane the harder it is to get the energy out of. A engine with a higher compression engine needs the higher octane to work properly, but a lower compression engine(designed for 87) does not need it, and can hurt it. Takes more effort to explode the higher octane.

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question90.htm
 

ctenidae

Active member
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
8,959
Points
38
Location
SW Connecticut
Unfortunately my car takes Super and is a stick shift, so if i put the cheap stuff it all it does it knock and hesitate, not good.

Yup. I go with 89, but will fill up with 93 every so often to clean out the pipes. Probably just upsets the computer, but I can feel the extra little kick.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
Interesting. I never knew there were engines that required higher octane gasoline; or maybe it's just I've never had a really nice car... ;)
 

bvibert

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
30,394
Points
38
Location
Torrington, CT
Interesting. I never knew there were engines that required higher octane gasoline; or maybe it's just I've never had a really nice car... ;)

Yup, high compression engines require higher octane to prevent pre-ignition.
 

SkiDork

New member
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
3,620
Points
0
Location
Merrick, NY
Interesting. I never knew there were engines that required higher octane gasoline; or maybe it's just I've never had a really nice car... ;)

You proly weren't a motorhead in the 60s muscle car era. Thats when high compression was king (except for supercharging) and that meant high octane.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
You proly weren't a motorhead in the 60s muscle car era. Thats when high compression was king (except for supercharging) and that meant high octane.

Not sure I was even born...
 

skiNEwhere

Active member
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
4,141
Points
38
Location
Dubai
I would vote on this but I use 91 octane, which seems to have ran off of the poll.....hmmm......
 

JimG.

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
12,173
Points
113
Location
Hopewell Jct., NY
The 60s muscle car era was huge in the 70s and 80s. Now its all that jap crap... Not for me.

Gimme a 69 Camaro with an LS7 any day

I owned a '67 Nova SS with a 327.

That came after the "69 Mach 1.

I sold both and my bike after realizing I would surely die in/on one of them.
 

SkiDork

New member
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
3,620
Points
0
Location
Merrick, NY
I owned a '67 Nova SS with a 327.

That came after the "69 Mach 1.

I sold both and my bike after realizing I would surely die in/on one of them.

Yeah, actually the fastest I ever went on wheels was on my 87 ZL1000 - 140

Sold that to BigKahuna on KZone.
 

Marc

New member
Joined
Sep 12, 2005
Messages
7,526
Points
0
Location
Dudley, MA
Website
www.marcpmc.com
The octane rating required to be used for a certain engine is based only on the absolute pressure reached in the combustion chamber.

The more octane in gasoline, the slower it burns, and more ignition energy it requires. The local energy produce by momentary arc of a spark plug is more than enough energy to ignite the highest octane rated gasoline sold a the pumps around the US, so using it in an engine that doesn't require higher octane (typically a low compression ratio naturally aspirated engine) doesn't hurt the engine any, but it runs less efficiently than it would on a lower octane rating. So it's a waste of money.

Engines with high compression ratios or low compression ratios and "forced induction" (mechanical air compression) will yield high combustion chamber pressures and typically require higher octane rated gasoline that takes more ignition energy. As said above, lower octane rated gas in a high pressure engine can ignite before the spark plug ignites the mixture at top dead center of the piston stroke when it should (or a couple degrees before TDC) because of the heat generated during the compression of the mixture. Pre ignition or pre detonation makes the engine run very poorly as energy is being applied to the piston while the piston's (and flywheel's) momentum is still carrying it opposed to the direction of expansion of the gas/air mixture. This slows the engine down, produces a lot of strong and very undesirable forces and will wear your bearings, drive train, gaskets and can potentially bend a connecting rod, valve, blow a head gasket, etc.


Redux: Run the minimum recommended octane rating for your particular engine.
 
Top