ThinkSnow
Member
So Prius owners will be even more insufferable now?
Maybe lower prices at the pump will coax them to at least drive faster.
Getting them out of the fast lane is another story....
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
So Prius owners will be even more insufferable now?
Maybe lower prices at the pump will coax them to at least drive faster.
Getting them out of the fast lane is another story....
Stay away from Drjeff he has the double trouble - he was in Texas and he flew on a plane - he may have ebola.
All the experts say as gas prices fall then so will our economy. I think its a fin sham by big oil to scare us into thinking prices cant get to low. I mean imagine them not making ridiculous profits and the little guy in business receiving the benefits of people having an extra dollar in their pocket.
Ridiculous profits? Time to rethink where you get your information from.
Lets put some numbers to this.
Here's a few of the largest companies in the US by total revenue (fy 2013): All numbers in Billions.
Exxon - 491
Walmart - 476
Berkshire Hathaway - 182
Apple - 171
GE - 146
Now lets look at their (net) profits, re-ranked in order.
Apple - 37
Exxon - 33
Berkshire Hathaway - 20
Walmart - 17
GE - 17
None of this means much by itself. The fact that Exxon had 491 Billion in revenue just means its a big company that had a lot of money pass through. It's what you get to keep that matters. What we really want to know is the margin, ie how much of each dollar taken in at the cash register is kept as profit. That's called margin, profit margin. So here we go. The next numbers are simply net profit divided by gross revenue, expressed as a percent.
Apple - 21.6%
Berkshire Hathaway - 10.7%
GE - 11.6%
Exxon - 6.7%
Walmart - 3.6%
Huh. Now who has the "ridiculous profits"? When you spend $400 on an Ipad, $86.40 goes in the pocket of Apple. When you buy $400 of gas from Exxon in a month, $26.80 goes in the pocket of Exxon, a third of what Apple makes. When you buy a flat screen at Walmart for $400, only $14.40 goes in the pocket of Walmart. That's a sixth of what Apple makes.
Exxon and Walmart are actually remarkably efficient at delivering their products at a very low mark-up. You should be glad Exxon isn't making profits at the rate of Berkshire, GE, or Apple.
Again, you can argue that Exxon is too big. I'd listen to that. The problem is how to restrict size when the competition is in other countries (BP, Shell Oil) are that size, and if you restrict the size of US companies you doom our domestic ownership to foreign entities.
I don't work for any of these companies. But I'm concerned that you vote based on huge misconceptions like I outlined above.
There are lots of recent news stories on the greed of Walmart. Walmart does an incredible job of delivering goods at a very low cost. I ask a different question - who is the greedy one, the one who delivers the goods (A whole lot of goods at that) at an extremely low cost, or the one who shops there to take advantage of those low prices? Look in the mirror. It is the consumer's greed that drives Walmart, but that headline doesn't sell newspapers.
When you spend $400 on an Ipad, $86.40 goes in the pocket of Apple. When you buy $400 of gas from Exxon in a month, $26.80 goes in the pocket of Exxon, a third of what Apple makes. When you buy a flat screen at Walmart for $400, only $14.40 goes in the pocket of Walmart. That's a sixth of what Apple makes.
Thank god I don't have to buy an iPad and flat screen TV every month.
Ridiculous profits? Time to rethink where you get your information from.
Lets put some numbers to this.
Here's a few of the largest companies in the US by total revenue (fy 2013): All numbers in Billions.
Exxon - 491
Walmart - 476
Berkshire Hathaway - 182
Apple - 171
GE - 146
Now lets look at their (net) profits, re-ranked in order.
Apple - 37
Exxon - 33
Berkshire Hathaway - 20
Walmart - 17
GE - 17
None of this means much by itself. The fact that Exxon had 491 Billion in revenue just means its a big company that had a lot of money pass through. It's what you get to keep that matters. What we really want to know is the margin, ie how much of each dollar taken in at the cash register is kept as profit. That's called margin, profit margin. So here we go. The next numbers are simply net profit divided by gross revenue, expressed as a percent.
Apple - 21.6%
Berkshire Hathaway - 10.7%
GE - 11.6%
Exxon - 6.7%
Walmart - 3.6%
Huh. Now who has the "ridiculous profits"? When you spend $400 on an Ipad, $86.40 goes in the pocket of Apple. When you buy $400 of gas from Exxon in a month, $26.80 goes in the pocket of Exxon, a third of what Apple makes. When you buy a flat screen at Walmart for $400, only $14.40 goes in the pocket of Walmart. That's a sixth of what Apple makes.
Exxon and Walmart are actually remarkably efficient at delivering their products at a very low mark-up. You should be glad Exxon isn't making profits at the rate of Berkshire, GE, or Apple.
Again, you can argue that Exxon is too big. I'd listen to that. The problem is how to restrict size when the competition is in other countries (BP, Shell Oil) are that size, and if you restrict the size of US companies you doom our domestic ownership to foreign entities.
I don't work for any of these companies. But I'm concerned that you vote based on huge misconceptions like I outlined above.
There are lots of recent news stories on the greed of Walmart. Walmart does an incredible job of delivering goods at a very low cost. I ask a different question - who is the greedy one, the one who delivers the goods (A whole lot of goods at that) at an extremely low cost, or the one who shops there to take advantage of those low prices? Look in the mirror. It is the consumer's greed that drives Walmart, but that headline doesn't sell newspapers.
BenedictGomez sucks.
It is totally meaningless to compare 5 companies from 5 different industries.
Ridiculous profits? Time to rethink where you get your information from.
The other one that gets me besides profits is the oil subsudies.
/
It is totally meaningless to compare 5 companies from 5 different industries.
Why?
If a company makes a 3% or a 7% or a 12% or a 20% profit margin then that's an apples to apples (no pun in this case intended!) comparison.
If 1 company makes a million dollars profit at say a 2% margin and another makes a million dollars of profit on a 50% margin, then who's the "lesser" company (obviously speaking from social standpoint here)?
If a company has a good or service that they produce and/or sell and they can get enough people to buy it for whatever amount they can get for it, then as I see it, GREAT for them!
Just because you hear this repeated 1002 times in the media, doesn't make it true. It's absurdly overstated. There's really nothing special or unique about this, it's 90% political talking point meant to deceive the public. Now subsidies to Wind & Solar? Holy poop those are real, and they're huge. Yet ya dont hear about them nearly as much as "oil subsidies" do you? Hmmmmm...... gosh I wonder why that is?
Ski fan you gotta buy it tree length