teachski
New member
I found this when I was going through some stuff tonight. It was in a brochure for a Hotel in that area
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
riverc0il said:nice one. great for historical purposes but a really bad rendering how how the mountain actually looks. i've seen that one before but can't remember where. hard to guess the date range... i would guess 60-70s.
salida said:those fools over at skiing magazine published a map of mitt of the same vintage in this years new september issue...
here is hoping that page E4 sticks to E5 and no one reads the article
thetrailboss said:Someday, when NH makes enough money off of their liquor outlets and toll booths, :lol: they will re-open Mittersill...but don't hold your breath :roll:
thetrailboss said:NICE map! I enjoyed looking at it.
while cannon's latest niehaus map does show the trails in the tuckerbrook area and the general area of mount jackson, it does not show ANY mittersill trails. regarding an expansion to mittersill, i doubt cannon will expand over there any time soon. likely not until i am past the age of being able to ski over there. it has become too much of a draw for the hardcore, they would risk lossing too many skiers if they put lifts over there. not like the main mountain has lift lines and a lot of traffic even on weekends.thetrailboss said:salida said:those fools over at skiing magazine published a map of mitt of the same vintage in this years new september issue...
here is hoping that page E4 sticks to E5 and no one reads the article
Probably the new Niehaus Map....the latest verisons DO depict Mittersill since it is now a part of the state land and an "unofficial" part of the ski area for skiers and riders to venture to at their own risk. Someday, when NH makes enough money off of their liquor outlets and toll booths, :lol: they will re-open Mittersill...but don't hold your breath :roll:
can't really elaborate TB, just know from hiking and skiing the place that those maps show the general lay of the land but would likely get a lot of people lost in today's actual mittersill. even back then when those maps were made, many of those trails were not as wide as depicted. it's totally off scale by a long shot. where the lift placement is/was really has nothing to do with it's gross inaccuracies. suffice to say you probably shouldn't reference that map as a modern day guide if you head over there unless you ski barrons which is pretty accurate.thetrailboss said::-? Can you elaborate? I can see how Mittersill is now different....this map only has two T-bars...a double was added later to it and it went higher up I believe. :blink:
Otherwise, looks accurate...
historically, the two areas had quite a few joint promotions when they both operated. also, bear in mind that the original cannon mountain ski trails such as the taft and tuckerbrook covered more terrain on the mittersill side of the mountain than the cannon side.It's interesting how the ski areas are presented in this format as if they were ONE ski area. At the time, Mittersill was independent and Cannon was, and still is, a state-operated mountain. Kind of ironic how this foreshadowed what happened...Mittersill is now state land.
Even with Mittersill added Cannon won't really be one of the largest ski areas in New England. Cannon with Mittersill would become the largest in NH, but VT and ME have larger resorts.NHpowderhound said:But I think the state WILL try to develop Mittersill sooner rather than later. It would become one of the largest ski areas in New Englnd. ((*
*))NHPH