Well, perhaps a better comparison is Pico. However, now that Magic has three chairs, the infrastructure at SB is pretty similar, just a bit more trail acreage.A mountain of that size and infrastructure really by default rules out the "bare bones" model. This was why I was skeptical that the Friends of Saddleback really had a chance of success (if they acquired it). You COULD try to operate it bare bones ie 1 lift, limited schedule, minimal snowmaking to keep costs down, but you would then likely lose what draw the place has.
Looking at a Pico comparison, SB has less infrastructure than Pico in terms of lifts. SB receives the same amount of snow as Pico, but holds what they get far better, so the snowmaking need is less. I just think short of a massive increase in accommodations like Sugarloaf has, running a 4-5 day a week schedule except for holidays, making a minimal amount of snow and having a mid-December to April 1st season length makes sense operationally considering their location. Running 7 days a week and into late April if not May like the Berry's did doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
Sent from my XT1635-01 using AlpineZone mobile app