Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I was bringing it up to explain why she might not be such a great interview. Didn't want to make anyone feel bad about staring at her boobies.
I was doing the magazines at our store today since our S&R called out sick. While taking down the old magazines, something caught my eye on another magazine. It was pixelation. On another magazine cover, the model's skins had been photoshopped so much that the image quality was completely degraded on closer look. I couldn't believe a major magazine would release such a cover. But it just goes to show you how much work is being done on those images... they aren't real people. Even if they do look good from an appropriate distance.
I guess anything can be changed now.I was doing the magazines at our store today since our S&R called out sick. While taking down the old magazines, something caught my eye on another magazine. It was pixelation. On another magazine cover, the model's skins had been photoshopped so much that the image quality was completely degraded on closer look. I couldn't believe a major magazine would release such a cover. But it just goes to show you how much work is being done on those images... they aren't real people. Even if they do look good from an appropriate distance.
Those are def not photoshopped you can see the ingrown hairs on her bikini wax ...
I applaud you Wa-loaf for your intense level of scrutiny, and i'm sure lots of views of those pictures that must have been tough to look at to find a detail that would hold up in most courts as "beyond reasonable doubt" of the authenticity of those photos!
Those are def not photoshopped you can see the ingrown hairs on her bikini wax ...
