Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
It seems really hard for me to believe someone could reach similar speeds as racers on a DH course when none of the mountains in the east with the exception of Whiteface could ever host an Olympic DH event.
It seems really hard for me to believe someone could reach similar speeds as racers on a DH course when none of the mountains in the east with the exception of Whiteface could ever host an Olympic DH event.
Where did you hit 35* at K?
It has to be a GPS glitch. None of the individual run data is faster than about 45 MPH. I know even that data overstates by 5-10 MPH. If I had hit that 79.3 there would have been a VERY long brown stain on a trail.
Yeah I don't believe it myself.
Actually IMO anything over 60 qualifies as tunaspeed because it's hard for people to go much faster than that with mainstream ski gear. I doubt I've passed 65 this season and its certainly not a race in my mind it's too dangerous to try to max out on speed.
But occasionally on a good day with fast snow, clear slopes, good visibility and all the factors in place most good skiers should be able to touch 60 and I would tend to believe anything up to around 65mph, only more if the skier had serious creds.
trying to hit tuna speed is not a goal!
Where was that?
It's was actually at belleayre mountain
Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
Doesn't seem likely. Not enough sustained vertical to hit that speed.