slug is referring to the extensions.That’s strange as all the front four were open on Tuesday when I was there……..
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
slug is referring to the extensions.That’s strange as all the front four were open on Tuesday when I was there……..
I think happened 5,469 posts ago…This thread is really starting to suck more than Vail does.
The crummedgeon factor is beyond large in this thread now
So Vail doesn’t open marginal terrain with thin cover expert only signs?The top of the runs..yes..they are rocky..steep..bumped up...
So is castle rock..its 100% open...Stowe used to be known for their steep runs...
The tops of the runs were open….The top of the runs?
When you click on a thread titled “(X) sucks” you should know what you’re getting into.This thread is really starting to suck more than Vail does.
The crummedgeon factor is beyond large in this thread now
Stowe..over a foot this week..over 100 inches...80% open...no front 4 top runs open.
Sugarbush...less snow..100% open
Vail...you suck.....bet a lot of Stowe people switch to SB next season...
Stowe was never as aggressive in opening trails as SB. But I used to see tons of people skiing closed trails at Stowe and patrol look the other way. That latter part has changed under Vail, I'm told.Is this really a Vail thing though? I remember even years ago Stowe being more conservative with opening trails than SB. SB patrol is very lenient with opening trails on thin cover (and I've always been thankful for that). Has been this way for a while. I really don't think this particular example is going to move the needle much for people jumping ship from Stowe to go to SB instead though.