Hawk
Well-known member
I hope they jack it up to $100. HA
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Think bigger! Make it $500. That way we can generate at least 10 pages of furious discussion on AZ.I hope they jack it up to $100. HA
How about a gondola with a mid station at the lowest elevation point? Then could you have a trail from both sides descend towards that mid station?Simply put - based on the topography there's no way to cut trails to easily ski from one side to the other. A lift of some sort is needed. Either you need a lift from the bottom of the middle going up to either side (which is essentially what was rejected years ago). Or you need a connecting lift as you have now with Slide Brook.
Not going to happen unless the USFS would agree to tear up the current agreement.How about a gondola with a mid station at the lowest elevation point? Then could you have a trail from both sides descend towards that mid station?
The topography unfortunately doesn’t work well for T2B skiing. Big T2B lifts sound cool and can be attractive on paper but it f the fall lines don’t work well it’s a very expensive proposition for what amounts to a novelty.Well it wouldn't just serve those two runs. It would also allow for a better early season and late season as well maybe. I'd put a mid station too. my mountain my lift.
Sure there's a bit of redundancy in it, but one could say the same thing having VH and Bravo. Why do we need both? Well, I love having redundancy.
I have always personally felt that one of Sugarbush weakness is no bottom to top lift. MRG has one, Stowe has 2. Four runner Quad and Gondy are both epic lifts and serve epic terrain top to bottom. Stratton, Smuggs. etc. I mean, stratton has 3 lifts that summit. Most others do. In fact, is Sugarbush the only one that doesn't? That's a personal nit that's all. I like the pods approach but having choice with top to bottom as well to me would make it better. So when playing fantasy mountain, I would always go back to that. The liftline is there, no regulations needed, which as we know in VT is a big barrier. so that's why I would love to see a basically bottom to top lift. especially over a base to base lift like Slidey-B. I can see your argument, although I would disagree on downspout, the only reason anyone skis downspout to to go to HG. That is the only reason. LOL
I realize that this is all theoretical discussion. But one thing that I wouldn't discount in today's world is the USFS saying, go ahead...do whatever you want.Not going to happen unless the USFS would agree to tear up the current agreement.
How about a gondola with a mid station at the lowest elevation point? Then could you have a trail from both sides descend towards that mid station?
I realize that this is all theoretical discussion. But one thing that I wouldn't discount in today's world is the USFS saying, go ahead...do whatever you want.
This is a quintessential Slidey B day!!
Who knows, maybe they put the forest up for sale. They are looking to liquidate buildings, why stop there?I realize that this is all theoretical discussion. But one thing that I wouldn't discount in today's world is the USFS saying, go ahead...do whatever you want.
Yes yes. Ai Robots will manicure the thousands of acres of gladed terrain and Mexico will pay for it.While we're smoking the crack pipe... I propose cutting glades everywhere in Slidebrook and putting in a 2-way surface transfer lift along the ridge from Castlerock peak across to Mt Ellen so people can just drop in wherever they feel like. At the bottom put in another surface haul-out lift (or 2 or 3 as needed). Done.![]()