• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Obligations

dbking

New member
Joined
Jan 13, 2009
Messages
97
Points
0
Location
Big Sky, Montana
Is a ski area obligated to keep as much open as possible at the end of a season? I bought a season pass. It seems that the ski area is breaking the deal by closing chairs and terrain that are in wonderful shape. It isn't just my ski area. This has been an industry norm forever. I suppose that there was nothing written when I bought my pass that said they would keep everything open that is reasonable. I'm not a lawyer but I think some of you folks are. Is there any legal ground to stand on with this issue?
We just got four feet of new snow and they are closing on Sunday. I'm sure you can feel my pain.
 

St. Bear

New member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
2,946
Points
0
Location
Washington, NJ
Website
twitter.com
In my opinion, it depends on the company.

If it's a publically traded company, their obligation is to make as much profit for the shareholders as possible. If that means closing a few weeks early because they're not getting enough visits to justify staying open, so be it.

If it's a private company, their obligation is whatever the hell they want it to be. You're just going along for the ride.

Closing after 4' is pretty ridiculous, but besides writing a complaint what can you do?
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,859
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
Is a ski area obligated to keep as much open as possible at the end of a season? I bought a season pass. It seems that the ski area is breaking the deal by closing chairs and terrain that are in wonderful shape. It isn't just my ski area. This has been an industry norm forever. I suppose that there was nothing written when I bought my pass that said they would keep everything open that is reasonable. I'm not a lawyer but I think some of you folks are. Is there any legal ground to stand on with this issue?
We just got four feet of new snow and they are closing on Sunday. I'm sure you can feel my pain.

we haven't had three feet of snow total in the Northeast since March 1st. Quitcha bitchin' :smash:

I would suggest you direct this question to Chris Nyberg's attention over on Kzone. :lol:
 

BushMogulMaster

Industry Rep
Industry Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2007
Messages
1,815
Points
48
Location
Leadville, CO
Let me make this simple. 95% of ski areas don't make money after April 15. It is costly to operate the resort. The resort ends up in the red. They can't afford to keep going. They shut down.

There.

So the answer is, no. The resort's obligation is to operate a fiscally sound business so that you can enjoy skiing while they ARE open. If they do not operate a fiscally sound operation, they will go under, and then you'll be doing a lot more hiking.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
Some places out west have to close due to their leases with the Forest Service. Animal migrations and what-not.
 

skiadikt

Active member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
1,081
Points
38
most western areas close in mid april regardless of snow on the hill. they're destination resorts without much of a local base to support them. in the east it's a different situation with most of the areas a reasonable drive from a huge population base so you do have a number trying to extend their season catering to the diehard skier. pres smith at killington thought it made sense to stay open until memorial weekend. out west areas like a-basin, snowbird, mammoth & w/b operate an extended spring season. but like bmm says for most part it doesn't make business sense. i would doubt at big sky they could enough fannies in the seats to make it financially viable.
 

dbking

New member
Joined
Jan 13, 2009
Messages
97
Points
0
Location
Big Sky, Montana
Hey, I'm not bitching. And I don't need your sympathy... I have a 120" base to finish my ski season. I don't expect the ski area to stay open longer. I want to know if they should be obligated to keep terrain open when thay ARE open. BMM makes a fine point that they need to make money. That is the company's view. Is there another one?
 

Rambo

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
891
Points
18
Location
Binghamton, NY
I have heard that Elk Mountain in PA, guarantees to be open a certain number of days each season to season's pass holders. I believe the number is 90 days. So when they go beyond the required 90 days they can close at their own discretion.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
34,254
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Hey, I'm not bitching. And I don't need your sympathy... I have a 120" base to finish my ski season. I don't expect the ski area to stay open longer. I want to know if they should be obligated to keep terrain open when thay ARE open. BMM makes a fine point that they need to make money. That is the company's view. Is there another one?

The simple answer is no, the resort is a business and must be run as a business. Ski resorts almost always run out of skiers before they run out of snow. The decision to close is almost always a business decision.

With regards to legal basis for forcing the resort to open, I can't really comment or offer legal advice. There are too many variables and other factors to consider.

That said, if there was some explicit promise to stay open until Date X, and no qualification, then there may be some grounds for reacting. But NO resort does that: almost all ticket sales clearly state that there are no refunds for weather and that there are no guarantees.

Best thing to do is to vote with your dollars if you are not happy. Sorry to say that......
 

billski

Active member
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
16,207
Points
38
Location
North Reading, Mass.
Website
ski.iabsi.com
I would expect the terms and conditions of contract for season passes apply. It would wholeheartedly expect those terms to have wiggle room factor, giving management to close at their discretion. Net-net is that I don't think anything is obliged. That, when dovetailed with the profit objective previously described will drive the decision.
 

vcunning

New member
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
550
Points
0
As much as it pains me to say this (I absolutely love spring skiing), as a passholder and vacation property owner, I would prefer my mountain make intelligent business decisions on when to close.

That being said, I'm hoping my mountain can plow down the massive show jumps on Inferno and have an "intelligent business decision" to spin a lift for a few more weekends after Easter.

I guess I want it both ways!
 

dmc

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
14,275
Points
0
i think they should stay open all year..
 

dmc

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Messages
14,275
Points
0
Hunter is now obliged to offer free bear sightings to all spring skiers. Just don't bring your picanic baskets...

or leave your garbage out...

I'm so over the thought of a ski area needing to stay open for me... It's totally understandable that an area cut back to stay open at the end... I look around Hunter's closing days and remember mostly season pass holders skiing... and sure we paid.. But we paid months before...
 

Glenn

Active member
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
7,692
Points
38
Location
CT & VT
That is the company's view. Is there another one?

I can't really think of one. If you're spinning the lifts for a handful of people, you're not only cutting into the bottom line, you may be cutting into next year's operating budget.

Like V said, I'd like my home base to make smart choice. I'd rather see them close a bit early and save that money to blow a little extra snow in November.
 

gmcunni

Active member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
11,502
Points
38
Location
CO Front Range
as a season pass holder how would you feel if the mountain charged "extra" for lifts running after a certain date? Would you pay a premium to enjoy a few more days of spring skiing?
 

St. Bear

New member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
2,946
Points
0
Location
Washington, NJ
Website
twitter.com
as a season pass holder how would you feel if the mountain charged "extra" for lifts running after a certain date? Would you pay a premium to enjoy a few more days of spring skiing?

Now that's an interesting proposition. Lots of variables to consider (price, how much extra skiing would be achieved, quality of snow, etc.). Speaking for myself, I would definitely consider it (if something like that were possible in NJ).
 

SIKSKIER

New member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
3,667
Points
0
Location
Bedford and Franconia NH
Cannon

I have to give kudos to John Devivo at Cannon.If they sold 40 tickets each day last weekend I'd be surprized.I booted up late at 8:30 and there were only 5 other people in the lodge.The place was pretty deserted and the conditions are true "springlike".I'm sure they were losing money but since he made a commitment to stay open till 4-12 they are doing just that.Maybe it's because they committed to BODE-FEST this Saturday.I'm happy.
 
Top