when you consider the economic impact.
that's the key right there
The balance sheet of State run parks including ski areas, maybe often show red, but they do generate a lot of black in ways that aren't always easy to measure.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
when you consider the economic impact.
This issue came up in the Cannon lease thread. If a so called poorly managed state run area is privatized, wouldn't that theoretically hurt other ski areas? A private business that is very bottom line driven (especially in light of trying to generate revenue for guaranteed payments to the state) would likely increase their own skier visits through better marketing and services, thereby hurting nearby competitors due to siphoning off their skier visits.
Obviously the local businesses surrounding those venues. Is that a problem?
I probably shouldn't speak for Laszlo, but ...
He feels that if Bell is loosing a million dollars a year* that is being subsidized by tax payers including him. And Bell is giving away quantities of free tickets - some estimates have this number as high as 10-15,000 a year. If this is so, then essentially taxpayer losses are being used to undercut private enterprise - Plattekill, Hunter, and Windham. A private business over the long haul would have to break even over the long haul to survive.
*http://adirondackdailyenterprise.co...4/ORDA-may-take-over-Catskill-ski-resort.html
I understand what you're saying. But at the same time, does Central Park in NYC make money? or any other park in the State of NY?
That's just it, parks inherently cost tax payers money, they are an amenity that greatly improves quality of life. Not everyone skis, but not everyone uses the beach at some random state park around the state either. Do you privatize all parks? That's the basis of the argument for the Cannon thread and the State of NH's budget shortfall.
Instead of bitching, Hunter, Plattekill, and Windham should try to change the rules that keep Belleayre public. As mentioned public parks do not make profits. Maybe we should close all the parks. Then we could pay even more teachers.
Laszlo bought Plattekill with full knowledge of what Belleayre was doing. After 20 years he is still in business. If Plattekill didn't work for him he always has another option - sell it (to me).8)
I'll pay higher prices at Belleayre if I have to, as long as they still have the long season. Belleayre is my early and late season mountain. I count on it for late November and late March early April skiing. If they shorten their season my season will end up being shorter.
...
Laszlo bought Plattekill with full knowledge of what Belleayre was doing. After 20 years he is still in business. If Plattekill didn't work for him he always has another option - sell it (to me).8)
I probably shouldn't speak for Laszlo, but ...
He feels that if Bell is loosing a million dollars a year* that is being subsidized by tax payers including him. And Bell is giving away quantities of free tickets - some estimates have this number as high as 10-15,000 a year. If this is so, then essentially taxpayer losses are being used to undercut private enterprise - Plattekill, Hunter, and Windham. A private business over the long haul would have to break even over the long haul to survive.
*http://adirondackdailyenterprise.co...4/ORDA-may-take-over-Catskill-ski-resort.html
So I'd say yes the taxpayers are getting value out of Belleayre and/or ORDA. Belleayre is close enough to NYC, NJ, and Albany too I guess to attract a lot of noobs, the price is right, and the layout is great for learners.
Not everyone. Anytime I'm in the Cats, I always stop by my favorite German place for a round or 4 and a good post-ski meal.BS - no value... People come up from NJ in the mini van all gassed up... Roll into Belleayre - ski for free - eat the packed lunch and go home.. No $$$ goes to the local economy.. And no tickets sold means no tax that goes into the economy.. I don't pay taxes to teach noobs from NJ to ski...
We need Bell to start contributing instead of sucking $ out of our tax base...
If you look at the big picture Belleayre does contribute more than it takes. Your example of EVERY NJ skier and rider that goes to Belleayre and doesn't spend a dime in NY state is not realistic.We need Bell to start contributing instead of sucking $ out of our tax base...
If you look at the big picture Belleayre does contribute more than it takes.
If you look at the big picture Belleayre does contribute more than it takes. Your example of EVERY NJ skier and rider that goes to Belleayre and doesn't spend a dime in NY state is not realistic.
If Belleayre generates enough tax dollars within Ulster county from income taxes, sales taxes, mortgage taxes, and hotel taxes to more than make up the difference between Belleayre expenses and income, then how is Hunter subsidizing Belleayre?It must be wonderful to be Hunter or Scotch Valley (oops, RIP) and to have to compete against an area they are forced to subsidize.
Siegel shows that BMSC's losses can be eliminated by administrative changes that would not require transfer to an authority. The CWC's own analysis indicates that the ski center may need only an additional $4.40 to $6 per skier to break even. These are efficiencies BMSC could easily find without restructuring, using utility-type cost-of-service principles and without further cutting wages or employment.
If Belleayre generates enough tax dollars within Ulster county from income taxes, sales taxes, mortgage taxes, and hotel taxes to more than make up the difference between Belleayre expenses and income, then how is Hunter subsidizing Belleayre?