AdironRider
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,573
- Points
- 83
I think they mean interstate driving versus two-lane back roads.
Yeah I got that. Still dont see a difference.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I think they mean interstate driving versus two-lane back roads.
Mine says 4 hrs, 1 min to Burke and 4 hrs, 48 min to Jay Peak from my doorstep on Google Maps.
In my history Google Maps is usually about 10% slower than it really takes me. So a 4 hr drive is really about 30 min faster, 3.5 hrs, so yeah 7 hours sounds about right to Burke. Still a hike for 1 days worth of skiing!!
Yeah I got that. Still dont see a difference.
Mine says 4 hrs, 1 min to Burke and 4 hrs, 48 min to Jay Peak from my doorstep on Google Maps.
In my history Google Maps is usually about 10% slower than it really takes me. So a 4 hr drive is really about 30 min faster, 3.5 hrs, so yeah 7 hours sounds about right to Burke. Still a hike for 1 days worth of skiing!!
Cal Rec on the overall project:
http://caledonianrecord.com/main.asp?SectionID=180&SubSectionID=778&ArticleID=84733
They have a Burke specific article behind their paywall.
Yeah I got that. Still dont see a difference.
No kidding right? It's tough to move away from the awesome times in Maine but once your in midwinter you would have no regrets.
One is theoretically easier than the other (no stop lights, school zones, neighborhoods, speed zones, intersections, etc).
The difference is really that I'd much prefer driving at my own pace on a highway for 3.5 hours than have to deal with slowing down to 25 miles per hour in town villages every 10-15 miles or get caught behind some slowpoke on a State Highway. Then there's also the speed trap factor in those small impoverished Maine towns where the local police try and justify their jobs through ticket revenue. I'd rather just set the cruise control to 75 and go.
Like I said Im a gearhead. I look forward to heel/toe downshifts. So thats most likely it.
I still cant get over putting 108 million into a mountain like Burke. You are never going to see that money back.
I still cant get over putting 108 million into a mountain like Burke. You are never going to see that money back.
The Burke of old, no. But we're not seeing what Bill Stenger is seeing. He is probably the best person to try to make it go. And he has some things in his favor that previous folks didn't. The first being the new lifts and second the wildly popular biking. Building a place for folks to stay will bring more folks in. The lodging and campgrounds, on most weekends, are all booked in the summer now. Throw up some decent lodging and more folks will come and try it.
It will be interesting to seewhat happens with the campground. Currently it is often sold out way in advance on weekends and the restroom/shower facility is way over taxed by the number of people staying there. I really think they should expand it to the other side of the toll road out into the field above the Old Cutter Inn.
However, with the building of these new lodges, will Burke Mtn try to get mountain bikers to occupy the rooms rather than Lean-Tos? I know a lot of MTBers like the camping aspect of a trip to the KT's. A campground has pretty low overhead compared to a lodge and it is a lot easier to clean after the dirty/muddy MTBers leave at the end of the weekend.
The Burke of old, no. But we're not seeing what Bill Stenger is seeing. He is probably the best person to try to make it go. And he has some things in his favor that previous folks didn't. The first being the new lifts and second the wildly popular biking. Building a place for folks to stay will bring more folks in. The lodging and campgrounds, on most weekends, are all booked in the summer now. Throw up some decent lodging and more folks will come and try it.