• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Big Burke announcement

halfpintvt

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
110
Points
0
Location
NEK Vermont
I've had a chance to look at another motion. This is a request to expand the receivership.

Some allegations in this motion that are of interest:
- The motion alleges that the Q Burke entities are owned and managed by Quiros AND Stenger.
- The hotel was built on land purchased with funds that were improperly diverted from an EB-5 offering.
- Funds pledged to the Receivership Entities were improperly commingled with the Q Burke entities.
- "Q Burke Entities and their investors have become yet another vehicle used by the Defendants to engage in a series of complicated and convoluted transactions aimed at carrying out the scheme described in the SEC's Complaint."
- The Q Burke entities would be unable to operate if the receivership is not expanded.
- The Receiver and the Vermont Attorney General's Office are fielding investor complaints.
- Q Burke Mountain Resort, LLC billed the Hotel LLC $571,653 for payroll and expenses incurred through December 26, 2015.


I've also had a chance to read Ariel Quiros' emergency motion to unfreeze assets.
Some highlights:
- The SEC conducted a three year investigation.
- "Literally, Quiros cannot purchase food or a cup of coffee..."
- Much of the alleged misconduct is outside of the five year statute of limitations.
- Quiros' net worth grew from $178 million as of 9/30/2014 to more than $200 million today.
- Jay Peak, Inc. was valued at approximately $100 million as of July, 2015.

Can you tell me where I can find these motions? Is there a link that I can follow?
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Can you tell me where I can find these motions? Is there a link that I can follow?

There isn't a link that I can give you. They are available through the federal court's PACER system. Anyone can open an account, but it's ten cents per page to download documents. They waive the fees if you don't exceed $15 in a quarter.
 

halfpintvt

New member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
110
Points
0
Location
NEK Vermont
There isn't a link that I can give you. They are available through the federal court's PACER system. Anyone can open an account, but it's ten cents per page to download documents. They waive the fees if you don't exceed $15 in a quarter.

Thank you so much. I appreciate your help, I will set up an account.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I just noticed footnote #3 of the Receiver's motion to access funds for Q Burke:
"While the accounts payable are still being studied, there may be over $1 million of trade payables . . . The Receiver will seek to defer those payables."

Look for "cash on delivery" to be the new normal at Q Burke.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,821
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I just noticed footnote #3 of the Receiver's motion to access funds for Q Burke:
"While the accounts payable are still being studied, there may be over $1 million of trade payables . . . The Receiver will seek to defer those payables."

Look for "cash on delivery" to be the new normal at Q Burke.

I have heard from numerous folks that the mountain was in excess of $1 mill in the red (approximately)
 
Last edited:

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I have heard from numerous folks that the mountain in excess of $1 mill in the red (approximately)

That's a big hole to dig out of before the beginning of next ski season. The Receiver is seeking to defer these payables. Suppliers are going to expect cash up front for anything in the future.

The Receiver has his work cut out for him, that's for sure.

Oddly enough, Receivership may have avoided a bankruptcy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

yeggous

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
2,170
Points
36
Location
Eagle, CO
That's a big hole to dig out of before the beginning of next ski season. The Receiver is seeking to defer these payables. Suppliers are going to expect cash up front for anything in the future.

The Receiver has his work cut out for him, that's for sure.

Oddly enough, Receivership may have avoided a bankruptcy.

Yeah, but they do this for a living. This is why you bring in a receiver. They are used to cleaning up messes.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Yeah, but they do this for a living. This is why you bring in a receiver. They are used to cleaning up messes.

Usually by selling the asset and wiping out creditors, no?

Maybe I'm just being cynical. They have Electric Mike to rely on. That man alone should be what's needed to turn things around. /sarcasm
 

sull1102

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2010
Messages
740
Points
18
Location
Boston, MA
I just noticed footnote #3 of the Receiver's motion to access funds for Q Burke:
"While the accounts payable are still being studied, there may be over $1 million of trade payables . . . The Receiver will seek to defer those payables."

Look for "cash on delivery" to be the new normal at Q Burke.

Knowing this and after the general consensus hat or would be tough to open Burke next year, I'd say it's almost a lock at this point that Burke misses a season or two. That hotel won't open till 2018 I bet.
 

yeggous

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
2,170
Points
36
Location
Eagle, CO
Usually by selling the asset and wiping out creditors, no?

I'm not an expert in the matter. Let's not make any assumptions of who gets paid what from the sale of the mountain. Considering that it was purchased with misappropriated funds there is an entire chain of hurt here.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,821
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Knowing this and after the general consensus hat or would be tough to open Burke next year, I'd say it's almost a lock at this point that Burke misses a season or two. That hotel won't open till 2018 I bet.

I highly doubt that. They would lose a lot of value to the assets if they do not open.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I highly doubt that. They would lose a lot of value to the assets if they do not open.

The money has to come from somewhere. I suppose it's largely up to the EB-5 investors at this point, since that's the only pot of money that I am aware of.
 

yeggous

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
2,170
Points
36
Location
Eagle, CO
The money has to come from somewhere. I suppose it's largely up to the EB-5 investors at this point, since that's the only pot of money that I am aware of.

The receiver can take on debt. The argument goes that by taking on debt and keeping the lights on they maximize the value to the creditors. Should they not take on debt and shutter operations, then the resale value my drop by an even greater amount.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
The receiver can take on debt. The argument goes that by taking on debt and keeping the lights on they maximize the value to the creditors. Should they not take on debt and shutter operations, then the resale value my drop by an even greater amount.

Good point. I guess there would have to be one hell of a security interest, though.
 

oldtimer

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
254
Points
16
Any investor who was reasonably risk tolerant would float much more than 1 million for a first one 2 chair lifts and 1 hotel-
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Top