• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Big Burke announcement

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,821
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
I haven't heard any outcry from Vermonters about Shumlin raising the gas taxes to pay for the $2m or so the state lost trying to implement a single payer healthcare system. Vermonters are just comfortably numb.

$2 million? Try $200 million for a website that doesn't work!

Now back to Burke.
 
Last edited:

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,821
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
If true, that's an extremist belief.

Not to mention, it dramatically and disproportionately economically harms the most poorest members of society, who ostensibly, are the ones the progressive movement routinely claims to be helping.

Oh it's true. They have been pushing to be the first with a carbon tax and to increase taxes on fossil fuels to reduce demand. When asked about the poor, the response is a blank stare.

Egad, back to Burke.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,821
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Now back on topic...this looks better:

13119020_10153687116729423_377007571072387841_n.jpg
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,768
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
The only problem I have with that is none of the problems with this resort have anything to do with the actually name of the resort or the stupid logo. A simple gesture to appease people, with no real purpose to improve the resort's situation.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,361
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
The only problem I have with that is none of the problems with this resort have anything to do with the actually name of the resort or the stupid logo. A simple gesture to appease people, with no real purpose to improve the resort's situation.

Perhaps, but it's a "sign" (no pun intended) and symbolic of change. It needs to be done.
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,768
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
Perhaps, but it's a "sign" (no pun intended) and symbolic of change. It needs to be done.

Agree with you there. I guess I am the type of guy that just doesn't need something done for a symbolic reason. I think you actually just said something like - "its putting lipstick on a pig". Thats kind of what I think about getting rid of the Q at this point and not waiting until after the new owners take over. No matter what - the Q was ultimately going to get dropped from the name and logos. And I can guarantee the new owners will elect to not change it again.
 

from_the_NEK

Active member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
4,576
Points
38
Location
Lyndonville, VT
Website
fineartamerica.com
A simple gesture to appease people, with no real purpose to improve the resort's situation.

How exactly does appeasing the locals and a good share of southern New Englanders who frequent(ed) Burke who have been completely alienated by the "Q" not improve the resort's situation? With the "Q" gone both physically and symbolically, people are going to feel a lot better about spending their money at Burke (me included).
I think this will really help boost summer attendance at summer activities at the mountain this year.
 

fbrissette

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
1,672
Points
48
Location
Montreal/Jay Peak
It's silly if you interpreted my comments as that I literally meant that not a single full-time job was ever created.
/QUOTE]

Skier skier said: There are certainly many year round jobs that have been created at Jay through this whole eb-5 debacle.

To which you replied: No there haven't.

Most reasonable people would without a doubt agree that 'several hundreds' qualifies as 'many'. It's silly you don't think so.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,361
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
There are certainly many year round jobs that have been created at Jay through this whole eb-5 debacle.

To which you replied: No there haven't.

Most reasonable people would without a doubt agree that 'several hundreds' qualifies as 'many'. It's silly you don't think so.

1) I rejected his premise that "several hundreds" of FTEs were created to begin with.

So there's that important fact....., but regardless of that,

2) As I prior noted, when "several thousand" is your bogey, even "several hundred" (which I doubt) is a complete, and utter, failure.

In other words, several hundred, even if true, is economically trivial against plan, trivial against funding, trivial against......this sorry trainwreck.
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,768
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
How exactly does appeasing the locals and a good share of southern New Englanders who frequent(ed) Burke who have been completely alienated by the "Q" not improve the resort's situation? With the "Q" gone both physically and symbolically, people are going to feel a lot better about spending their money at Burke (me included).
I think this will really help boost summer attendance at summer activities at the mountain this year.

Removing Quiros from the ownership should make you and everybody else feel a lot better. I did, nor do not disagree with that. I just don't get hung up on the name of the resort - it is not something that means anything to me. If a new owner came in and purchased Stowe and called it Q Stowe - it would not, in anyway, change my love for the place. Put it this way - if Quirus came in and spent 20 million on snow making, and ran the resort good and had the hotel open, and didn't fire anyone and whatever else everyone has a gripe with - would the issue with the name "Q" be a big deal? I would say not, but maybe to some people that would be enough to not support the resort. That is just how I feel about it.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,821
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Removing Quiros from the ownership should make you and everybody else feel a lot better. I did, nor do not disagree with that. I just don't get hung up on the name of the resort - it is not something that means anything to me. If a new owner came in and purchased Stowe and called it Q Stowe - it would not, in anyway, change my love for the place. Put it this way - if Quirus came in and spent 20 million on snow making, and ran the resort good and had the hotel open, and didn't fire anyone and whatever else everyone has a gripe with - would the issue with the name "Q" be a big deal? I would say not, but maybe to some people that would be enough to not support the resort. That is just how I feel about it.

But he didn't do any of that. So that is moot. Also be sure to read:

https://www.saminfo.com/best-worst-in-marketing/4273-best-worst-marketing-2013-14
 

mbedle

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,768
Points
48
Location
Barto, Pennsylvania
1) I rejected his premise that "several hundreds" of FTEs were created to begin with.

So there's that important fact....., but regardless of that,

2) As I prior noted, when "several thousand" is your bogey, even "several hundred" (which I doubt) is a complete, and utter, failure.

In other words, several hundred, even if true, is economically trivial against plan, trivial against funding, trivial against......this sorry trainwreck.

Do you really believe that they haven't generated several hundred of new jobs at Jay peak? And, as I posted earlier, it doesn't matter how many jobs they created at Jay Peak or even in Orleans Co. If all was built out by these EB-5 programs happened, they would have had to generate 7,000 FTE. It was obvious to everyone that those employees would not be from Orleans Co., with a populations of 27K.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,179
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
If a new owner came in and purchased Stowe and called it Q Stowe - it would not, in anyway, change my love for the place. Put it this way - if Quirus came in and spent 20 million on snow making, and ran the resort good and had the hotel open, and didn't fire anyone and whatever else everyone has a gripe with - would the issue with the name "Q" be a big deal?

The big deal for me with the Q is it's completely arrogant. It's the equivalent of a dog pissing on the place as "mine." It also places the Qs above the community and everything else in the NEK that makes Burke, Burke.

I'm a traditionalist and when you've got a place like Burke or Stowe with the history they have; town, resort and many businesses sharing in the identify, you leave it alone. The role is to be a steward of the mountain until it's time for the next owner after you move on.

If anyone changed the name of Stowe, there would be a far more severe reaction than what happened at Burke.

If they had left the resort as just Burke and maybe called the hotel, "Q Hotel at Burke Mountain Resort", people wouldn't be so annoyed.
 

Not Sure

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
2,859
Points
63
Location
Lehigh County Pa.
Website
www.youtube.com
Being a relative Newb to this forum and not knowing the history of Burke I interpreted the "Q" as a durogitory poke at the previous owners LOL . After reading lots of posts I think keeping the Q and adding an "F" temporarily would be therapeutic for the locals.

Actually Eb-5 has created lots of jobs , just not where intended. Lots of lawyers will be working overtime!
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
I think that the mistake of adding a Q was amplified by poor decisions that were made early on - such as severing ties with Kingdom Trails and bashing the largest benefactor of the ski area.


.
 
Top