Marc
New member
Ride a bike without a helmet.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
BRAVO!!! :beer:
I'll say it again. I still will never understand why those that are successful in life financially are often times looked negatively upon. Maybe a jealousy thing? I don't know, but it doesn't make sense to me...
It the ones who are successful at the expense of society that tend to garner negative vibes. Bill Gates does not have an MBA, treats his employees relatively well and gives back to society in substantial ways. Contrast that with Enron.
Maybe it's an ethics thing.
making a bit of sense here...
I hope this isn't off-topic, but, with ski season just around the corner, what do we do about transport to the mountains? A Prius or Civic or whatever is nice and all, but for those of us that have a way's to go to get to the mountains, what do we drive?
Anyone given any thought to good cars/trucks for skiing that won't break the bank at the pump? Or, since ski gear isn't getting smaller, do we just have to chalk this one up to "skiing is expensive"?
Just get a corolla or a civic and put snow tires on it. How often do you really run into snow deeper than 6-8 inches of main roads? Plus it will be way better at braking then a 4x4 SUV or Pickup since it weighs so much less.
If you need room for gear (read: more than one passenger) I'd recommend either a Suby wagon or a crossover SUV (Escape, Rav4 etc.).
You can't have space and 40 mpg. Just doesn't work. But you can have adequate space and competent traction with high 20's probably 30 mpg on highways.
someone besides the BOD should be responsible for setting compensation of upper management,
The Rav4 4x4 claims 27mpg which is very good, I'm not sure that I believe it but even 22-24mpg is still good for a 4x4 vehicle.
How much more room do you think a Subie wagon, or a crossover SUV has over a corolla or a civic? I think it is a lot less than people think. Some of the new smaller crossover have basically nothing behind the second row.
A lot. Even your Nissan has a lot more room than a corolla/civic. Start piling in packs and gear in a small car and you see a huge difference.
Although I think I meant to mention the 4Runner, not the Rav4. Whichever is the one based on the Camry frame.
Here's some numbers to get a better idea of what I'm talkin about-
Cargo room (cu ft):
Corolla: 12
4Runner: 42
Outback: 33.5
Civic: 11.5
Escape: 30
Here's some numbers to get a better idea of what I'm talkin about-
Cargo room (cu ft):
Corolla: 12
4Runner: 42
Outback: 33.5
Civic: 11.5
Escape: 30
Do you have the figures for the SUVs with the rear seats up? There's no way that my Outback has that much space unless you put the seats down...
Yes, but wagons and SUV have way more room vertically, which isn't really used, since you still have to be able to see behind you. You will only use about half that height. So it really is more like:
Corolla: 12
4Runner: 21
Outback: 17
Civic: 11.5
Escape: 15
Still more but not a huge deal. Also, besides the 4runner you still will not be able to fit 4 people + skis in anyone of those vehicles comfortably without a roof box.
(I'm bored and still have another hour to kill before I go to work, so debating cargo room of SUV's vs. sedans is the most interesting thing I have going right now since it is 60 degrees out and raining.)
I stand corrected...just looked at the figures for the Outback:That's cargo room, which is defined as anything that is not potentially passenger space. AKA, everything from the rear seats to the back of the car.
I stand corrected...just looked at the figures for the Outback:
2008 Subaru Outback
Luggage Capacity: 33.5 cu. ft.
Maximum Cargo Capacity: 65 cu. ft.
Must account for being able to pile the luggage/cargo up to the roof.