hammer
Active member
Didn't VT have a gas tax break last year? Did it help or hurt?
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
If you live in snow country diesels can be a bear to start in the winter so not very practical but folks do have them and they depend on friends like myself to give them a jump to get started on a frosty morning.
Also, the big diesel generators that ski hills used are a big air quality issue and is the reason they are being phased out. Killington used to release more CO2 in the air than Burlington. Not a big fan of diesel, add in the odor......
Regarding odor, love the smell of those biofuel vehicles that use cooking oil they get from restaurants, smells like french fries. yum
All symptoms of older diesels. New automatic glowplug systems have really eliminated cold weather starting problems. Several diesels have been made and are currently being offered that meet EPA Tier 2 emmisions requirements and new solid particulate filters have elminated the sooty, black smoke from the incomplete combustion conditions. The big issue from diesels is the release of nitrogen oxides, not CO2 anyway. With new high pressure injectors and the (finally) wide spread availability of low sulfur diesel, this is much less of a concern. Tier 2 restricts nitrogen oxides quite strictly. European emissions standards allow diesels to output nearly seven times the concentration of nitrogen oxides than gas jobs to promote the use of diesels.
The newest diesels I'd be willing to bet would be nearly indistinguishable in operation from a gasoline car.
Now consider this: A new diesel can get similar fuel mileage to a gas electric hybrid because diesel fuel has a higher energy and mass density than gasoline and produces more power than a gas-hybrid. Also a diesel can potentially be much more efficient in certain conditions like highway driving where hybrids can't take advantage of regenerative breaking and the extra hardware is only a weight penalty.
Now also consider that diesels are lubricated partially by their own fuel, run at lower over all engine speeds and are built much heftier than most gasoline cars to handle the higher compression ratios and the result is an engine that can last several hundred thousand miles with proper maintenance.
Also consider that diesels can burn bio diesel or crude diesel indiscriminately.
Then consider the environmental penalties paid for the manufacture and disposal of the NiMH batteries currently used in hybrids, which won't have even a third of the service life a diesel engine will. And Toyota is currently switching to Lithium Ion which present even more of an environmental concern with regards to disposal.
ctenidae... I think I had a stroke when I saw Carl again. That would probably explain it.
:dunce:
I just finished changing more of the incandescent light bulbs in our house to compact flourescent, and I just figured that with the 20 bulbs replaced so far we have reduced our lighting energy consumption from 1200 watts to 315. So I wonder what reducing 885 watts will save me, and I have quite a lot more bulbs to replace.
I suppose every bit of conservation helps in the long run.
They are supposed to last 3-4 times as long as a standard incandescent bulb.
I hope so, but I also read some studies where the bulbs lost half of there luminescence after reaching only 40% into there predicted lifespan. Also these bulbs do not do well in a location where they are being turned on/off frequently, which is where I have alot of them placed in my house, so we will see.
I am doing it more for the enviornment than for my wallet, by helping to cut down on greenhouse gas emissions used to produce the electricity I use.
This is really the no brainer consumer oriented economics that must happen for decreasing our personal energy usage to be a issue everyone can participate in on a large and significant scale. When the economics point to dramatic cost savings on part of the consumer and becomes a "no brainer," these new green solutions will take hold quickly. We noticed a 1/3 decrease in our electricity bill by switching to the new light bulbs... and we are very good about always turning lights off. I suspect a bigger house that always has lights on could save up to as much as 50%. The fact that they last longer means less replacement costs too, total no brainer and I am surprised regular light bulbs are still sold in significant numbers.I just finished changing more of the incandescent light bulbs in our house to compact flourescent, and I just figured that with the 20 bulbs replaced so far we have reduced our lighting energy consumption from 1200 watts to 315. So I wonder what reducing 885 watts will save me, and I have quite a lot more bulbs to replace.
I suppose every bit of conservation helps in the long run.