Highway Star
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
- Messages
- 2,921
- Points
- 36
I'd had the Skiing Gear Review sitting on my dining room table for a week or two. I finally got around to looking through it.
My first comment is that they seem to be reviewing equipment that only 5% to 10% of the market could ski on. Regardless of the category, it reviews skis that an intermediate would hate. No wonder they're in a world of financial hurt. They're not targeting the mass market that really needs the information and probably won't ever demo anything before buying.
I'm kind of surprised they don't cover a broader selection of traditional mid-fat skis. Very few resort skiers are going to want anything much wider than 80mm since they rarely leave the groomers.... particularly in the east. They only review 7 skis in that category compared to 13 in the 85mm 50/50 category. They seem to have created a myth that you can't ski powder on a 78mm mid-fat. Anybody who isn't a 6 footer is going to find an 85mm ski pretty sluggish edge-to-edge.
I'm still a little confused that there's enough of a market for those 120+mm rockered powder skis to stock all the ski shops with them. Most skiers don't have a quiver where they can justify having a $1000 powder-only ski that is frightening on the hardpack. It's interesting to read about them and I might grab a pair out of the bargain bin as a leftover for the quiver. I find it hard to believe shops will sell much of that kind of equipment at anywhere close to retail.
It doesn't matter what people can't ski. People who pay $1000+ at a ski shop for skis and bindings want the newest, latest, greatest ski that skiing reviews. This year and last year are a little different due to the economy, but there will always be at least a few advanced level skis that get sold to everyone.
Remember when everyone had volkl 6-stars, yet no one could carve them? Yikes.