skibum1321
New member
You don't see too many people carving through the trees. Carving isn't ideal in all situations - bumps for example, where you tend to skid from bump to bump. Sure, I'll carve down a groomer but that's about where it ends.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
skibum1321 said:You don't see too many people carving through the trees. Carving isn't ideal in all situations - bumps for example, where you tend to skid from bump to bump. Sure, I'll carve down a groomer but that's about where it ends.
uphillklimber said:As far as skidding getting a bad name, I think that is from when someone is on too steep a slope or too challenging of a terrain. I have seen it over and over, mostly with snowboarders, but plenty of skiiers also. And it always seems to be on White Heat or some other such marquee steep spot. I do have to defer to those who suddelny find themselves in over their heads. But I see so many scrape their snowboard or skiis sideways down a hill, removing all the snow for 5 feet wide, then head right back up the lift to the very same run, instead of heading for less challenging terrain to perfect their skills. That, is what gives skidding a bad name.
HDHaller said:sledhaulingmedic said:Tactically, you need to carve your turn and ride it right out of and across the fall line to keep your speed in check, rather letting the skis kick out (slip) across the fall line.
Not exactly right. The "slip" you refer to, skidding, checks speed just fine. In its most exagerated form, skidding is a hockey stop, which is the fastest way to safely stop on skis.
Carving is valuable not because it checks speed, but because it is efficient. And what's efficiency? A combination of speed and control.
-HDH
JimG. said:KevinF said:HDHaller said:sledhaulingmedic said:Tactically, you need to carve your turn and ride it right out of and across the fall line to keep your speed in check, rather letting the skis kick out (slip) across the fall line.
Not exactly right. The "slip" you refer to, skidding, checks speed just fine. In its most exagerated form, skidding is a hockey stop, which is the fastest way to safely stop on skis.
Carving is valuable not because it checks speed, but because it is efficient. And what's efficiency? A combination of speed and control.
-HDH
I would agree with sledhaulingmedic in this case. Any turn -- carved or not -- can be carried not only across the fall line, but until you're facing right back uphill. Trying to ski uphill will slow you down in a big hurry. I would argue that "turning to a stop" would keep you more in control then a hockey-stop would as well. Attempting to do a hockey stop in any sort of variable conditions will most likely give you a close up view of the snow to boot.
Interesting; I'd have to agree more with HD's analysis.... Carved turns are most efficient in terms of control and SPEED. If you want to go fast, you want to carve as much as possible.
To slow speed using carved turns only, turns need to be complete (rounded) and in some cases so complete that ski tips actually do start to point UP the fall line as sled and Kevin have pointed out.
Problem is, to maintain a carved turn motion has to be somewhat deliberate, not the best scenario for an emergency stop. That's where a skidded (slipped, hockey stop) turn is more effective.
Frankly, skidding is an art that is essential in anyone's ski arsenal. Sure, everyone wants to think they only carve and never skid, but that's just not true or even possible or desireable. Somewhere along the line, skid became a dirty skiing word.
I don't buy into that.
This is a good question...I remember being told to do more traversing when the terrain gets too steep for comfort, but you end up using more of the trail and you risk getting the faster skiers and riders :angry: at you...LineSki15 said:this is a good thread. I am one of those skiiers that starts to skid if presented with very steep terrain. I don't skid 20 feet down the trail, but my turns are more short skids than they are carved turns. what do you guys recommend to keep speed in check on steeps?
LineSki15 said:this is a good thread. I am one of those skiiers that starts to skid if presented with very steep terrain. I don't skid 20 feet down the trail, but my turns are more short skids than they are carved turns. what do you guys recommend to keep speed in check on steeps?
hammer said:This is a good question...I remember being told to do more traversing when the terrain gets too steep for comfort, but you end up using more of the trail and you risk getting the faster skiers and riders :angry: at you...LineSki15 said:this is a good thread. I am one of those skiiers that starts to skid if presented with very steep terrain. I don't skid 20 feet down the trail, but my turns are more short skids than they are carved turns. what do you guys recommend to keep speed in check on steeps?
uphillklimber said:4)Weight on the uphill ski.
Thought I'd throw my $0.02 on this one...uphillklimber said:Weight on the uphill ski? Hmmm. Uphillklimber, do you mean weight on the uphill ski AS WELL AS THE DOWNHILL SKI? ... because you used to have too much weight (pressure) on the downhill ski alone?
Yup, that's just about exactly what we used to do alot of, and still deal with from time to time.
We have seen some kids, as part of their lessons, ski down on one ski only. The results are fairly self evident. (No, I have never done that). I read in a ski magazine about 90/10, or something like that. Basically, when you travel thru a green area, to liven it up, they suggested that we place 90% of our weight on one ski and 10% on the other ski, and hold that relative weight distribution while we carve a green. This is to increase leg strength and help us to spread the weight a bit more. Depending on which leg you have the weight with 90% on, one turn will be easy and natural, while the other turn will task you a bit.
Anyways, I have never really accomplished the 90/10 thing yet. I do it for a turn or two, then I'm like "You gotta be kiddin' me!!!" I am also thinking, I should really be able to do this....
Hmmmm..... where to ski this weekend.....Skiis waxed? check....edges squared and sharp? Check.... ready to go???? You betcha!!!!
Outstanding point JimG !!!!!JimG. said:LineSki15 said:....but my turns are more short skids than they are carved turns. what do you guys recommend to keep speed in check on steeps?
Could be 2 things:
1) Turn shape...Instead of getting your skis up on their edges early in the turn (immediately after the edge change after the last turn) and then allowing them to carve a nice arc, you're lazy early in the turn and wind up applying all your edge pressure at the end of the turn, thus skidding out.....
hammer said:To my surprise, when I placed more of my focus on turning with the downhill ski, I found that I was able to get more of a carve out of the skis.
but being back-seat, like heel-lift, equals death, especially in bumps or on variable terrain.
BTW, didn't someone get footage of that wipe out? If so, then where the heck is it?!
Once I get backseated, I vigorously "punch" forward with both hands and that usually pulls me out of it.