• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Jay Peak bombshell

crystalmountainskier

Active member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
278
Points
28
On Stuart's podcast Rusty Gregory used the word unusual to describe Jay. He essentially said Alterra is not interested in running the water park and softball tournament businesses.
 

fbrissette

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
1,672
Points
48
Location
Montreal/Jay Peak
Rusty said Softball.
Rusty should do his homework better then. This is obviously not my field, but I compeltely fail to see how running a waterpark (and whatever tournaments) would be a problem, Isn't profitability the only issue ?

Tremblant runs ziplines, summer sleds, a mini-golf and a shitload of other activities, and I believe the resort is actually more profitable in the summer than in winter. I fail to see Rusty's logic.
 

crystalmountainskier

Active member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
278
Points
28
Rusty should do his homework better then. This is obviously not my field, but I compeltely fail to see how running a waterpark (and whatever tournaments) would be a problem, Isn't profitability the only issue ?

Tremblant runs ziplines, summer sleds, a mini-golf and a shitload of other activities, and I believe the resort is actually more profitable in the summer than in winter. I fail to see Rusty's logic.
The fact no one has bought Burke or Jay for multiple years suggest profitability is also an issue.
 

crank

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Messages
1,376
Points
63
Location
CT
Goldberg said something a few years back to the effect that Burke had a ways to go and needed to become profitable in order to pay EB5 investors before a sale.

Burke becoming profitable? How does that happen?


I figure there are probably no major players really interested in Jay. None of them move this slowly.
 

Tin Woodsman

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Messages
1,117
Points
48
Rusty should do his homework better then. This is obviously not my field, but I compeltely fail to see how running a waterpark (and whatever tournaments) would be a problem, Isn't profitability the only issue ?

Tremblant runs ziplines, summer sleds, a mini-golf and a shitload of other activities, and I believe the resort is actually more profitable in the summer than in winter. I fail to see Rusty's logic.

I would argue that all of those Tremblant activities are pretty much par for the course for summer ops in the ski industry. All things that Alterra has experience running. The waterpark and hockey/soccer tournament business is a pretty big step outside/beyond that, and I have no concerns with them defining their business model/expertise in a way that excludes those businesses. Depending on who buys Jay, there is still a decent chance it winds up on the IKON pass anyway, so they could potentially have their cake and eat it too.
 

ss20

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
3,983
Points
113
Location
A minute from the Alta exit off the I-15!
Goldberg said something a few years back to the effect that Burke had a ways to go and needed to become profitable in order to pay EB5 investors before a sale.

Burke becoming profitable? How does that happen?


I figure there are probably no major players really interested in Jay. None of them move this slowly.

I'd bet if the lower quad at Burke was a fixed grip that'd help the bottom line. The resort operates too few of days and sees too few skier visits to warrant 2 hsq's. And of course, that abomination of a hotel must lose money 90% of the year.

Jay needs a lot of work for the on-mountain infrastructure that doesn't see a huge ROI. The tram is a money sink. The Bonnie needs to be a 6pack. Snowmaking needs improvement. I wouldn't touch it either, especially since Vail and Alterra already have a good chunk of the Northeast in their portfolios.
 

KustyTheKlown

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5,466
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn
is it an abomination bc they spent a lot of bamboozled money on a hotel that was bound to mostly sit empty? or is it shitty inside? it looks nice from the outside.
 

urungus

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
1,992
Points
113
Location
Western Mass
This is from last October but it explains the sales process the receiver is taking. The receiver's fees have mounted to $10M. Of course he has squeezed a lot of money out of the entangled other than the sale of the resorts.

There appears to be no end to people enriching themselves from this. How many more years until the receivers fees exceed the eventual sale price, LOL
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,321
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
is it an abomination bc they spent a lot of bamboozled money on a hotel that was bound to mostly sit empty? or is it shitty inside? it looks nice from the outside.

Is it Fourseaons/Ritz Carlton nice inside? Nope. Is It a well above average hotel compared to the offerings across the majority of Northeast ski country? From the couple of times I have stayed there when my kids had races at Burke, yes.

Plus the view out the windows from the dining area on a clear day of the Willoughby (?sp) Gap in the distance is impressive. Would make for a nice location for a wedding reception for sure
 
Last edited:

crank

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Messages
1,376
Points
63
Location
CT
We spent a few days/nights there when they first opened. They were running a very low priced promotional rate and it was the week between Christmas and NYE. And we got a foot of fresh snow so all was good!

Nice place. Only complaint we had was a weird one. The patio area in back was heated so no ice, except for the ramp up to the hot tub where there was a freaking treacherous, slippery AF, inclined walkway that had us death gripping the railing.

I have since checked back a few times looking for another sweet deal but high prices abound. Anyways, nowadays I feel obligated to get as much bang as possible out of my Ikon pass.
 

KustyTheKlown

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2013
Messages
5,466
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn
yea, i love how it frames willoughby gap, but i haven't stayed there myself. generally cheaping it up in lyndon when I'm in the area.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,864
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
I'd bet if the lower quad at Burke was a fixed grip that'd help the bottom line. The resort operates too few of days and sees too few skier visits to warrant 2 hsq's. And of course, that abomination of a hotel must lose money 90% of the year.

Jay needs a lot of work for the on-mountain infrastructure that doesn't see a huge ROI. The tram is a money sink. The Bonnie needs to be a 6pack. Snowmaking needs improvement. I wouldn't touch it either, especially since Vail and Alterra already have a good chunk of the Northeast in their portfolios.
The problem with your idea is the lower HSQ makes for an outstanding learning pod as is. Sure they might save some on operations, but that is the older of the two HSQs and likely has been almost amortized out. Why would they sink more capital into a new FGQ prior to a sale? That doesn't make any accounting sense, especially to downgrade am asset.
 

ss20

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
3,983
Points
113
Location
A minute from the Alta exit off the I-15!
The problem with your idea is the lower HSQ makes for an outstanding learning pod as is. Sure they might save some on operations, but that is the older of the two HSQs and likely has been almost amortized out. Why would they sink more capital into a new FGQ prior to a sale? That doesn't make any accounting sense, especially to downgrade am asset.

Not saying they would take it out, but it was overkill when they put it in, JMO. It's a super short ride. And as you know the maintenance costs are many multiples more than that of a FGQ and a lifespan of half a FGQ.
 

machski

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
3,864
Points
113
Location
Northwood, NH (Sunday River, ME)
Not saying they would take it out, but it was overkill when they put it in, JMO. It's a super short ride. And as you know the maintenance costs are many multiples more than that of a FGQ and a lifespan of half a FGQ.
Don't disagree then, however carpet loading chairs weren't really a thing yet for FG when this particular HSQ went in. Was a bit weird with a HSQ there and just FG serving the main mountain for sure.
 
Top