• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Killingtons impact on other resorts

Killington impact is

  • The primary reason

    Votes: 7 15.9%
  • part of the equation

    Votes: 22 50.0%
  • Minimal

    Votes: 15 34.1%

  • Total voters
    44

2knees

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,330
Points
0
Location
Safe
How much a part does killingtons early closing have on the decisions of Mt. Snow particularly, and sunday river, sugaloaf and sugarbush to stay open late? I say Mt. Snow primarily because they are the ones who seem to be significantly adding to their season. Sugarbush closed on the same day last year as killington and i believe sugarloaf and sunday river have historically made it to late april if not may. someone correct me if i'm wrong.
 

wa-loaf

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
15,109
Points
48
Location
Mordor
I think Killington has a bigger impact on the other Vt areas. Sugarloaf has always stayed open into May if conditions permitted and Sunday River used to have May 1 as a free skiing day.
 

danny p

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
726
Points
0
I think Mount Snow would be staying open as late as possible even with competition from Killington. I think they are looking for the title of first to open, last to close, jmo. I think some areas are probably relieved that Killington is closing early, its less pressure on them to compete. I do think Sugarbush is probably staying open later in part due to K's closing date.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
If Mount Snow can pull it off and stay open beyond Okemo and Killington, I think they might do pretty well, or at least break even. I have no data to back that up, but it seems to me with all the whining about Killington closing earlier than they historically used to, there has to be a decent sized group that would take advantage of them being open later. Snow is easily accessible from the NYC metro and even Boston so there's opportunity there. They should sell 2008-09 passes on the way in/out.
 

Stache

New member
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
299
Points
0
Location
UPstate, NY
Website
WWW.SKIWITHSTACHE.COM
Agree with danny p.
Hard to beat the reputation of Kmart BUT...
When the "King of Spring" abdicates the thrown I believe that is the open door to Mt. Snow entering the thrown room. Closer to the die hards and now without any other close competition.


PS I haven't traded or sold off my Mt. Snow vouchers.
 

loafer89

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
3,978
Points
0
Location
Enfield, C.T
I honestly cannot remember Sugarloaf skiing into May in recent times. Last year they closed on April 29th, and on Easter Sunday in 2006.

Historically sugarloaf skied into May in the 1960's - 1990's and skied until June 1st in 1996?
 

skiadikt

Active member
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
1,081
Points
38
i kinda think that k is doing other areas a favor by closing early. even if they stay open as late like mt snow or a week later like the bush, they all come out winners and k the loser.

back in the early 80's the bush & k went at it pretty hard to see who could stay open the latest. i remember very late may '81, the bush had closed the day before and as i was in kbl as i was booting up, the lifties & mtn ops guys were congratulating each other on k beating out the da bush. made a lasting impression on me right then & there.
 

drjeff

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,633
Points
113
Location
Brooklyn, CT
If Mount Snow can pull it off and stay open beyond Okemo and Killington, I think they might do pretty well, or at least break even. I have no data to back that up, but it seems to me with all the whining about Killington closing earlier than they historically used to, there has to be a decent sized group that would take advantage of them being open later. Snow is easily accessible from the NYC metro and even Boston so there's opportunity there. The should sell 2008-09 passes on the way in/out.

Believe me, unless you're blind, you can't miss the signs in and around the base area advertising the '08/'09 Season passes.

Personally, while how Powdr has chosen to manage Killington has made it "nicer" for Peak Resorts and Mount Snow this year, I don't think that it has made as much of a difference as folks think. Tim Boyd and Peak have said from day 1 after the deal with ASC closed last year that he/they truely feel that Mount Snow is/can be one of the premier mountains in the East. Tim has also said that no if ands or buts about it, Mount Snow is the premier holding in Peak's staple of resorts and that he plans on running it that way. They invested alot of $$ in the fan guns this past summer and are spending alot more $$ on more fan guns this summer, and while mother nature has been very cooperative weather wise this season, the more buzz they get from staying open longer will directly be incorporated into next years marketing. All of this I really feel would have happened even if Powdr chose to run Killington in it's "traditional" fashion, but IMHO it hasn't really changed how Mount Snow ran this season, they were going to "go big" no matter what this year.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
Believe me, unless you're blind, you can't miss the signs in and around the base area advertising the '08/'09 Season passes.

I'm thinking even go bigger than that. Set up a tent right at the clock tower ticket window and make it very easy to buy passes. Indicate to the customer that the pass is valid that day. Sell lots of beer in the same area. ;)

Personally, while how Powdr has chosen to manage Killington has made it "nicer" for Peak Resorts and Mount Snow this year, I don't think that it has made as much of a difference as folks think. Tim Boyd and Peak have said from day 1 after the deal with ASC closed last year that he/they truely feel that Mount Snow is/can be one of the premier mountains in the East. Tim has also said that no if ands or buts about it, Mount Snow is the premier holding in Peak's staple of resorts and that he plans on running it that way. They invested alot of $$ in the fan guns this past summer and are spending alot more $$ on more fan guns this summer, and while mother nature has been very cooperative weather wise this season, the more buzz they get from staying open longer will directly be incorporated into next years marketing. All of this I really feel would have happened even if Powdr chose to run Killington in it's "traditional" fashion, but IMHO it hasn't really changed how Mount Snow ran this season, they were going to "go big" no matter what this year.

I will say the base area at Snow looks fantastic now. I was there for Oktoberfest and in November and was impressed with how fresh everything looked. New paint, roofs, etc. It should be interesting to see how far they can/are willing to push the season.
 

loafer89

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
3,978
Points
0
Location
Enfield, C.T
Powdr discouraged me from sking at Killington/Pico with a shorter ski season/reduced service and I gladly take me money to Boyne. There is a huge difference in how much snow has been made on the trails at Sunday River, the level of service is much better and the staff much frendlier now that they are no longer employed with the Titanic of skiing companies.

Similarly to what jrjeff was saying about Peaks and Mount Snow, Boyne brought in a fresh vision to the ski areas they own and would probably not care much what Powdr does as far as ski operations are concerned as they have there own sense of direction.
 

2knees

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,330
Points
0
Location
Safe
I totally agree with the comments about Boyne and Peak. New owners, new direction. I dont think they give a rats arse what killington does or did. What about sugarbush though? any opinion there from the locals?
 

Vortex

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2004
Messages
458
Points
18
Location
Canterbury NH, Bethel Me
Make no mistake Boyne is working on the boston market that goes to Vt. It started with the Red sox promotion. Seems like Boyne is getting some of the metro Boston group. Staying open late and opening earlier than other areas is all part of the plan. K brand name. not so strong any more.

Peaks has done well also. K and it patrons are the left out.
 

loafer89

New member
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
3,978
Points
0
Location
Enfield, C.T
Back in April of 2007 alot of people where jumping for joy that ASC sold off Killington/Pico and when I saw that it was Powdr Corp who would be doing the ski operations part of running killington, I foresaw the resulting short season and crappy customer service.

If you look at what they own out west, Mount Batchelor used to ski into July and they now close in Mid-May, I skied at the Las Vegas Ski And snowboard Resort, which is owned by Powdr and frankly the place is a run down piece of @hit.

I really do not expect Powdr to put any effort at all into regaining the length of season that Killington once had, and happily for me I finally get to ski Sugarloaf in May as an indirect result.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
17,569
Points
0
Sugarbush always used to stay open until May...not this year...so an earlier closing date at Sugarbush due to an earlier closing date at Killington..makes sense...and Hunter just gave up..booo
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
Sugarbush always used to stay open until May...not this year...so an earlier closing date at Sugarbush due to an earlier closing date at Killington..makes sense...and Hunter just gave up..booo

Not sure I've seen anywhere that Sugarbush is not going to try to reopen for a weekend in May. And don't you think Killington not being open will result in the opposite - more potential skier visits that SB could tap into?
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
17,569
Points
0
Not sure I've seen anywhere that Sugarbush is not going to try to reopen for a weekend in May. And don't you think Killington not being open will result in the opposite - more potential skier visits that SB could tap into?

Yes because Jeff who has been a passholder and homeowner at Killington for decades is pissed at Killington and taking his spring business to Sugarbush..
 

BeanoNYC

Active member
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
5,080
Points
38
Location
Long Island, NY
I think that ASC put all their energy into keeping Killington open late. Now that Mount Snow is not an ASC company they can go for broke.
 

deadheadskier

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
28,854
Points
113
Location
Southeast NH
I think the biggest effect on late season skiing this year is all of the transfers in ownership. It's a big proving season for the new operators. I'll be interested to see if the trend continues next year. Hopefully it does and to an even greater extent. It would be nice to see a few 'glaciers' pop up around New England next year.
 

Greg

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 1, 2001
Messages
31,154
Points
0
I think the biggest effect on late season skiing this year is all of the transfers in ownership. It's a big proving season for the new operators. I'll be interested to see if the trend continues next year. Hopefully it does and to an even greater extent. It would be nice to see a few 'glaciers' pop up around New England next year.

It seems to me that Snow built a pretty impressive base using the new fan guns this season. They should have an even better chance at glacier building next season once the West Lake project is completed.
 

2knees

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
8,330
Points
0
Location
Safe
It seems to me that Snow built a pretty impressive base using the new fan guns this season. They should have an even better chance at glacier building next season once the West Lake project is completed.

West Lake project? I thought it was the Somerset reservoir they were trying to hook up to.
 
Top