IIIRC that bridge is 30 years old!True, but they did get the pedestrian bridge from the lot across route 4 put in. So already a steel eyesore there
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
IIIRC that bridge is 30 years old!True, but they did get the pedestrian bridge from the lot across route 4 put in. So already a steel eyesore there
Wasnโt it built with the new gondola in โ94/โ95?I would've guessed 20 something years old. But either way my memory of "whoa, new bridge over rt4 " is distant memory now. But seems like something that should've been there even well before that given the speed some people drive on 4
Maybe I agree it would've been a logical part of that constructionWasnโt it built with the new gondola in โ94/โ95?
That timeframe seems reasonable if memory serves. Also when they put the "new" Skyeship in, I still believe that Northeast Passage as a base area, with parking, was still in play, creating added parking options along Route 4 and even Route 100 when coming from the East or SouthWasnโt it built with the new gondola in โ94/โ95?
OK. So that bridge was part of the original construction of the Gondola. I was not sure if it was an add-on years later. It seemed to be about the same vintage.Correct, Skyeship bridge installed in '94 and had no effect on the wetland setbacks which a parking garage would, as it would need to be on the east side of the highway.
Also yes Northeast Passage had another 5 years or so at that point.
I guess we'll see what effect the village would have. I know I won't touch the access road with a 10 foot pole, but I don't anyway. I start at Skyeship (and if not open Bear). Based on how busy Skyeship has gotten (full lots and parking up and down Route 4) on some weekends I think it's been "discovered" and others agree at this point.
Am I missing something, or will the K-1 lots be mainly untouched? My preferred spot if I'm parking in the basin is somewhere at the end of those lots by the Six. I prefer to stay the hell away from Rams or Snowshed, so if I can still park up in the K-1 lots after the village goes in then honestly I wouldn't even mind it being there.
I agree, but I primarily avoid Killington on Saturdays so hopefully weekdays would still have some spots up there.They shouldn't be touched but put two and two together who is going to park there vs shuttle to the new village lot. Plenty of people.
I never ski K when skyship is open. Or bear for that matter.Correct, Skyeship bridge installed in '94 and had no effect on the wetland setbacks which a parking garage would, as it would need to be on the east side of the highway.
Also yes Northeast Passage had another 5 years or so at that point.
I guess we'll see what effect the village would have. I know I won't touch the access road with a 10 foot pole, but I don't anyway. I start at Skyeship (and if not open Bear). Based on how busy Skyeship has gotten (full lots and parking up and down Route 4) on some weekends I think it's been "discovered" and others agree at this point.
Early and late season when they are the only game in town.So do you not ski there? They're open 7 days a week Christmas to 4/1 roughly.
So do you not ski there? They're open 7 days a week Christmas to 4/1 roughly.
Yup, same boat, typically use almost all my Killington IKON days in November and May, wish I had a couple more days to burn in the heart of the season.Early and late season when they are the only game in town.
This coming season not sure Iโll even get there late season with SS being closed for the lift replacement. Matters how late they keep the canyon area open and what that entails.Yup, same boat, typically use almost all my Killington IKON days in November and May, wish I had a couple more days to burn in the heart of the season.