• Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!

    You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!

Re: EB-5 article

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,182
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Good. Hopefully the recent national discussion regarding immigration policy will kill this loathsome government-fueled boondoggle.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,456
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
Good. Hopefully the recent national discussion regarding immigration policy will kill this loathsome government-fueled boondoggle.

I think someone disagrees.....

404.jpg


Look closely at the podium.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,637
Points
63
Good. Hopefully the recent national discussion regarding immigration policy will kill this loathsome government-fueled boondoggle.

Explain how this a boondoggle. You do realize it doesnt cost the government money?
I understand the criticism that the program doesnt create the jobs it claims and some may think it unfair to allow wealthy foreigners to "buy" a visa. But its only a boondoggle to the foreigners, and they are more than happy to get their visa, so who cares?
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,182
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Explain how this a boondoggle. You do realize it doesnt cost the government money?
I understand the criticism that the program doesnt create the jobs it claims and some may think it unfair to allow wealthy foreigners to "buy" a visa. But its only a boondoggle to the foreigners, and they are more than happy to get their visa, so who cares?

You already explained part of how it's a boondoggle, right after asking "how" it's a boondoggle. For much more of an answer, please see the Jay Peak thread where I've written extensively on this, and predicted the "shenanigans" that are now taking place long before there was ever a hint of it. Also, re: government, physical money isn't the only asset being peddled here from that perspective. Far from it.
 

luvinjaycloud

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
41
Points
6
Explain how this a boondoggle. You do realize it doesn't cost the government money?
I understand the criticism that the program doesn't create the jobs it claims and some may think it unfair to allow wealthy foreigners to "buy" a visa. But its only a boondoggle to the foreigners, and they are more than happy to get their visa, so who cares?

don't even bother reading that other thread. there is no substance or facts that the H8ters bring to the table. They just seem to want Jay peak to lose yet many of them still enjoy the great ski mountain that it is.

You are right in that the program works, and now that it is getting overregulated will probably phase out. It's too bad because it has brought revenue and jobs to the NEK that NEVER would have arrived had there been no EB-5. (that is fact) As for the investors, i am sure most of them are more sophisticated than those that opine here and they read the fine print and knew what they were getting going into this; most importantly a durable VISA for their family and path to citizenship.
 

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,182
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Somebody has drank the EB-5 Kool-Aid.

Pay no attention to demonizers of glorious EB-5 applicant Jay Peak Resort. They are Great Satan.

It quite normal get near half Billion dollars with no accounting of finance. Everything okay. SEC merely tool of Great Satan.

07-minister.jpg
 
Last edited:

BenedictGomez

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 26, 2011
Messages
12,182
Points
113
Location
Wasatch Back
Somebody has drank the EB-5 Kool-Aid.

On a serious note though, this part below almost made me spit-out my Miller Lite onto the keyboard.


You are right in that the program works, and now that it is getting overregulated will probably phase out.

LOL. Great stuff! Please write more of this material.

Bernie Madoff was one of the best investors of the 20th century, until bastards started "over-regulating" him.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,456
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
On a serious note though, this part below almost made me spit-out my Miller Lite onto the keyboard.




LOL. Great stuff! Please write more of this material.

Bernie Madoff was one of the best investors of the 20th century, until bastards started "over-regulating" him.

+1. The recent oversight is needed since there are cases of abuse...not with Jay (that we know of).


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,637
Points
63
i have still yet to read anyone actually identifying how eb5 costs our govt. money. I guess you all must be solely concerned with the welfare of wealthy Chinese investors spiriting their profits out of that country.
 

VTKilarney

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
5,553
Points
63
Location
VT NEK
Re: EB-5 article

i have still yet to read anyone actually identifying how eb5 costs our govt. money. I guess you all must be solely concerned with the welfare of wealthy Chinese investors spiriting their profits out of that country.

That's a very myopic way to look at things. Go back and read the comments about the best way to use money to generate economic growth. Hint: EB-5 doesn't achieve this end well at all. You should also understand that the type of job matters - not just the creation of a job. A part time chambermaid who is subject to seasonal layoffs is not very gainfully employed.
 
Last edited:

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,456
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
i have still yet to read anyone actually identifying how eb5 costs our govt. money. I guess you all must be solely concerned with the welfare of wealthy Chinese investors spiriting their profits out of that country.

That's not the issue


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,637
Points
63
That's a very myopic way to look at things. Go back and read the comments about the best way to use money to generate economic growth. Hint: EB-5 doesn't achieve this end well at all. You should also understand that the type of job matters - not just the creation of a job. A part time chambermaid who is subject to seasonal layoffs is not very gainfully employed.

im not arguing that it is, only that it's not costing us anything. frankly attracting tens of millions of dollars in foreign capital is a good thing, whether it's the most efficient use of same, is of no moment to me. Would we prefer that money was creating shitty jobs in China instead of here? Of course not. I think we'd all rather see that part time chambairmaid position in vt than in Beijing. And that's putting aside the construction design engineering jobs generated by the construction, albeit temporary. It's better than 'nothing especially when it's not costing us anything.
 

HowieT2

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
1,637
Points
63
That's not the issue


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone

it is to me. Seems the criticism of the program should really be directed at the individual projects and not at the program itself. These projects are investments. Some will be successful and others won't. Some will provide a good financial return for their investors and others won't. But getting foreign capital to fund job creating projects putting Americans to work is a worthwhile endeavor regardless of the merits of the individual projects.
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,456
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
im not arguing that it is, only that it's not costing us anything. frankly attracting tens of millions of dollars in foreign capital is a good thing, whether it's the most efficient use of same, is of no moment to me. Would we prefer that money was creating shitty jobs in China instead of here? Of course not. I think we'd all rather see that part time chambairmaid position in vt than in Beijing. And that's putting aside the construction design engineering jobs generated by the construction, albeit temporary. It's better than 'nothing especially when it's not costing us anything.

The problem is that locals aren't working as chambermaids or lifties. Instead they have to bring in foreign workers to do these jobs. Yes, there are a few local professional jobs maintained, but I think that resorts aren't really creating well-paying jobs NNE needs.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 

thetrailboss

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
32,456
Points
113
Location
NEK by Birth
it is to me. Seems the criticism of the program should really be directed at the individual projects and not at the program itself. These projects are investments. Some will be successful and others won't. Some will provide a good financial return for their investors and others won't. But getting foreign capital to fund job creating projects putting Americans to work is a worthwhile endeavor regardless of the merits of the individual projects.

Agreed. But the criticism is two-fold. For some projects there has been little or no oversight from regulators leading to lots of questions and concern about fraud. Vermont is (slowly) waking up to this issue. Second is the immigration issue that some don't like. In theory it is a good idea.


Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
 
Top