Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Good. Hopefully the recent national discussion regarding immigration policy will kill this loathsome government-fueled boondoggle.
Good. Hopefully the recent national discussion regarding immigration policy will kill this loathsome government-fueled boondoggle.
Good. Hopefully the recent national discussion regarding immigration policy will kill this loathsome government-fueled boondoggle.
Good. Hopefully the recent national discussion regarding immigration policy will kill this loathsome government-fueled boondoggle.
discussion
Explain how this a boondoggle. You do realize it doesnt cost the government money?
I understand the criticism that the program doesnt create the jobs it claims and some may think it unfair to allow wealthy foreigners to "buy" a visa. But its only a boondoggle to the foreigners, and they are more than happy to get their visa, so who cares?
Explain how this a boondoggle. You do realize it doesn't cost the government money?
I understand the criticism that the program doesn't create the jobs it claims and some may think it unfair to allow wealthy foreigners to "buy" a visa. But its only a boondoggle to the foreigners, and they are more than happy to get their visa, so who cares?
Somebody has drank the EB-5 Kool-Aid.
Somebody has drank the EB-5 Kool-Aid.
You are right in that the program works, and now that it is getting overregulated will probably phase out.
On a serious note though, this part below almost made me spit-out my Miller Lite onto the keyboard.
LOL. Great stuff! Please write more of this material.
Bernie Madoff was one of the best investors of the 20th century, until bastards started "over-regulating" him.
i have still yet to read anyone actually identifying how eb5 costs our govt. money. I guess you all must be solely concerned with the welfare of wealthy Chinese investors spiriting their profits out of that country.
i have still yet to read anyone actually identifying how eb5 costs our govt. money. I guess you all must be solely concerned with the welfare of wealthy Chinese investors spiriting their profits out of that country.
That's a very myopic way to look at things. Go back and read the comments about the best way to use money to generate economic growth. Hint: EB-5 doesn't achieve this end well at all. You should also understand that the type of job matters - not just the creation of a job. A part time chambermaid who is subject to seasonal layoffs is not very gainfully employed.
That's not the issue
Sent from my iPhone using AlpineZone
im not arguing that it is, only that it's not costing us anything. frankly attracting tens of millions of dollars in foreign capital is a good thing, whether it's the most efficient use of same, is of no moment to me. Would we prefer that money was creating shitty jobs in China instead of here? Of course not. I think we'd all rather see that part time chambairmaid position in vt than in Beijing. And that's putting aside the construction design engineering jobs generated by the construction, albeit temporary. It's better than 'nothing especially when it's not costing us anything.
it is to me. Seems the criticism of the program should really be directed at the individual projects and not at the program itself. These projects are investments. Some will be successful and others won't. Some will provide a good financial return for their investors and others won't. But getting foreign capital to fund job creating projects putting Americans to work is a worthwhile endeavor regardless of the merits of the individual projects.