The more I think about this I think that Stenger was so drunk off his own Kool-aid that he was the savior of the NEK. Therefore any wrong doing that was going on would be dismissed because of all the good he was doing. A modern day Robin Hood.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
So someone who have been following this a bit more closely than me answer this:
Initially the Tram work was going to cost in the six figures and the $750k was going to cover it. When did it balloon to $4.1 mill for the same work?
That had to do with the sensational headline in the BFP that had an out of context quote with no other explanation around the headline. The BFP article was HEAVILY revised after the TGR article came out.
The full TGR article was to summarize the various takes that various media outlets had on the situation while adding a bit of their own flare to it.
Anti-tram though I am, we're forgetting something. If the tram is ditched the name of the hotel, Tram Haus, no longer makes sense.
Come on guys (taps temple condescendingly), use your brains.
I'd agree. And it's a big reason why I give Bill some credit. From 2008 till 2013 AQ owned 80% of the mountain and everyone was cheering Bill on to fulfill these promises at the resort he's run for 30 years. What was Bill going to do if he smelled fishy from AQ? Halt everything? Break every promise made to staff, region, based on stuff the resort owner was doing no one seemed to care about? Tough spot.
Ask any con man, he truly believe his own con!The more I think about this I think that Stenger was so drunk off his own Kool-aid that he was the savior of the NEK. Therefore any wrong doing that was going on would be dismissed because of all the good he was doing. A modern day Robin Hood.
Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Goldberg say that Jay would need between $7m-$11.5m to continue operations at Jay for the off season alone? I'm not sure if that includes repairs to the tram which are estimated to be $4.1m. Also I don't recall reading anything about a $1m deposit already being made towards the repair of the tram. What I remember reading is they would need to put a 50% deposit down shortly towards the cost of the repair in order to get it done. Didn't sound as if any deposit had already been made. It also doesn't sound like Jay has anywhere near that amount of cash on hand frozen or not.
I mentioned that earlier. It's an iconic lift.
Please. Its cool and all but iconic, no way.
Jay Peak was a backwater with rumored decent snow (at the time, and for the East), just 7 or 8 years ago. Even now, the tram isn't bringing in the masses. Water park and snowfall are what drives Jay.
There is a list of lifts probably 50 long that have more recognition than Jay's tram, just in the USA.
No summit access is a major problem, but one that can be solved without necessarily the Tram. Throwing 4.1 mill at a 52 year old lift is probably not great long term thinking regardless.
Have to agree with this.
MRG single chair is "iconic", Jay Peak's tram is antiquated, annoying, and completely inefficient.
Even Jackson's tram is inefficient at 600 people per hour max. Jay's capacity is probably substantially less on theirs.
Jay's is a mere 360 per hour.
Just do a youtube search with any of the above mentioned lifts and compare against the Tram. The Tram is a different experience. A quad is just a quad.Superstar, Forerunner Quad, that orange bubble at Okemo.
Just based on skier visits alone a lot more folks have a lot more exposure to numerous lifts in just Vermont.
No-one went to Jay for the Tram, there is over 40 years of proof for that, if they do/did go, they go/went for the snow. Now they go for a water park/snow.
Disagree. It's iconic simply because there is only a few. Iconic doesn't necessarily equate to popular.Please. Its cool and all but iconic, no way.
Jay Peak was a backwater with rumored decent snow (at the time, and for the East), just 7 or 8 years ago. Even now, the tram isn't bringing in the masses. Water park and snowfall are what drives Jay.
There is a list of lifts probably 50 long that have more recognition than Jay's tram, just in the USA.
No summit access is a major problem, but one that can be solved without necessarily the Tram. Throwing 4.1 mill at a 52 year old lift is probably not great long term thinking regardless.
What exactly are the benefits of a tram if the capacity is so low? They obviously don't appear to be cost efficient to maintain.