steamboat1
New member
I never ski MRG on the weekends because of the lift line.
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
I never ski MRG on the weekends because of the lift line.
"Down here" you mean metro NY/NJ area, it's not even Jay's target audience.I highly doubt it to the point I'd put money on it if I could. Down here, for instance, nobody has even heard of Jay Peak. Blank stares. Wouldnt even know what it is. Most people at least know that Mad River Glen is a ski mountain, and many can even recite "Ski It If You Can" due to their multi-decade marketing, tee-shirts, bumper stickers all over.
But pouring all these millions of dollars into repairing a 50+ year old technology that is now going to be 25% LESS efficient than even its' prior already inefficient iteration makes absolutely no sense.
Minor point, but why does 25% less efficient keep getting bantered about? The normal car will still take 60, and the water tank car is the one reduced to 45 for the weight of the tank, correct? So it will be 12.5% less efficient?
A new carriage will weigh more than the existing one. The weight of the loaded carrier will be
no more than 8’137 kg (17’939 lbs.). Why 8’137 kg? Original design load plus 3%. That is the
acceptable tolerance range.
The weight of the cabin and hanger is 2’439 kg. The new carriage weighs approx. 2’150 kg.
We expect to allow operating the tram with approx. 45 passengers plus 1 attendant after the
upgrade.
The water tank needs to be removed when passengers are being transported.
If the water tank is mounted for water transport only about 820 gallons are allowed to transport.
"Down here" you mean metro NY/NJ area, it's not even Jay's target audience.
Jay is a whole lot closer to Montreal, and more reasonably accessible from Boston. From New York/New Jersey? Forget about it!
170 average may sound low but there are often a lot of (sub-100lbs) kids on there too.it looks like they are using an estimate of 170 lbs/person (and that needs to include the weight of skis).
"Down here" you mean metro NY/NJ area, it's not even Jay's target audience.
Jay is a whole lot closer to Montreal, and more reasonably accessible from Boston. From New York/New Jersey? Forget about it!
170 average may sound low but there are often a lot of (sub-100lbs) kids on there too.
Exactly correct; which is why it's not iconic.
People in Florida have never heard of Jay Peak either, but many know that Mad River Glen is a ski resort.
you forget that there are around 500000 (yes 500k) French Canadians vacationing or taking winter residence in Florida (I'm not sure why but that's beside the point).
And to think that Floridians know about Mad River Glen is absurd. Most of them barely know what snow is.
Can someone remind me again why we are comparing lifts at Jay and MRG and even more so why it matters which lift is more iconic, (which is a fairly incaluable metric)?
Two completely different lifts with different business plans at two different resorts that couldn't be any more different other than residing in the same state.
Jeez,
A lot of Sturm and Drang about an inanimate object.
Yes the tram is not efficient and is costing a lot of money to fix.
But since expansion, it is used by many visitors year round whether they are skiers, water parkers, golfers, hockey people or leaf peepers. Additionally it is nice that physically challenged people riding the tram get to see what all of us may take for granted from time to time. A beautiful mountain range and incredible views.
Jay is on the mend, el nino is dying and it will be a good winter in the east, enjoy.
Because BG is bound and determined to convince everyone that the tram at Jay is the stupidest thing ever and that we are idiots for thinking otherwise.
If people in Jersey haven't heard about it, it must be it doesn't exist right?