ss20
Well-known member
Capped dumps seem to be a great place for solar. Wide open and very little other uses.
They ski on capped landfills in the Midwest! That's better than solar!
Welcome to AlpineZone, the largest online community of skiers and snowboarders in the Northeast!
You may have to REGISTER before you can post. Registering is FREE, gets rid of the majority of advertisements, and lets you participate in giveaways and other AlpineZone events!
Capped dumps seem to be a great place for solar. Wide open and very little other uses.
It isn't just the interstates covered with wind turbines. The explosion I see flying across the US in the last 20 years is amazing. 20 years ago large scale arrays were limited to certain areas (for example, the pass into Palm Springs from LA has had them as long as I can remember) and you didn't see many. Today, it is hard to fly anywhere in the US and not be able to spot a large wind array from the air at any moment. Maybe they are profitable, but there are definitely $$ incentives for energy companies to push to renewables.I'll help steer this thread further off course
I drive across America a lot in my old age. Price of gas hit me pretty hard this winter (worst was $6.49 in Mammoth Lakes, CA). This winter I made it all the way from the Wash DC area to San Diego, with a lot of smaller trips around the Rockies, Wasatch, and Sierras. Every time I make the big drive through the heartlands (KS, NE, TX, etc.) I see more and more wind turbines. They must be profitable. I have mixed feelings about them, but I guess if you have to scar the land, then putting them close to interstates is probably the best place. I hope the energy they provide reduces our reliance on fossil fuels?
I40 in the Texas Panhandle, 13 May 2022, wind turbines as far as the eye can see:
View attachment 54490
PS: Anecdotally, I did not experience any notably huge crowds skiing in WV, CO, UT and CA this winter.
It isn't just the interstates covered with wind turbines. The explosion I see flying across the US in the last 20 years is amazing. 20 years ago large scale arrays were limited to certain areas (for example, the pass into Palm Springs from LA has had them as long as I can remember) and you didn't see many. Today, it is hard to fly anywhere in the US and not be able to spot a large wind array from the air at any moment. Maybe they are profitable, but there are definitely $$ incentives for energy companies to push to renewables.
I like that idea of covering the aqueducts solar canopies. That also drives me nuts flying over AZ and CA and seeing all the open air aqueduct lines running thru very arid or desert areas in the sun. Always wonder how much water is lost before it gets to it's destination.
Can't they just have 50% of the windmills spin in the opposite direction?
I purchase my electricity from a "community solar" project that is located on a nearby capped dump....Capped dumps seem to be a great place for solar. Wide open and very little other uses.
True, NIMBYs even fought a solar project on a capped dump in Bridgeport, stating it was now a scenic hill.Drive through my home state of CT. We seem to limit the vast majority of our windmills in the state to select holes on various mini golf courses
The NIMBY factor is strong in CT when it comes to windmills and solar arrays too for that matter
Thing nobody talks about is that for us residents of NH/ME/VT our neighbors to the north pay a fraction of our utility rates.
I work in the hydro industry and fully understand that Hydro Quebec does not have a flawless environmental record but their turbines spin 24/7 with an effectively endless lifespan. I am currently looking at scans of hand drawings from the 30s for one overhaul, it amazes me to dream of the volume of coal/oil/NG that has gone unburned due to this one dam.
There are no impactful domestic projects remaining in the northeast USA, eastern Canada however has abundant hydro resources. The nimbyism relates to transmission lines but I never found lines any uglier than panels or windmills. I also get that people prefer domestic sources but fairly certain Trudeau isn't planning to invade Iceland any time soon.But of course "South of the Border" here in the US, the narrative is all about how many fish will either get chopped up in the hydro turbines or won't be able to use the fish ladders assocaited with so many dams to get to their desired spawning grounds, rather than the amount of fossil fuels that could be saved over time.
The total hijacking and absolute desire to completely control the narrative that the Green movement has at times over what they view as their desired projects verses what potentially could be of use, is both disgusting and often hypocritical to their big picture goal of a cleaner environment and cleaner energy
There are no impactful domestic projects remaining in the northeast USA, eastern Canada however has abundant hydro resources. The nimbyism relates to transmission lines but I never found lines any uglier than panels or windmills. I also get that people prefer domestic sources but fairly certain Trudeau isn't planning to invade Iceland any time soon.
FYI, I just spent $325 for about 2,650 miles of driving, SLC to Wash DC via a few National Parks and scenic spots along the way. Used Interstate 40 for much of the way.
agreed. there's plenty of space to put solar panels.I think what India is doing and California is looking at with putting solar canopies over their irrigation canals is a promising development for both power generation and water preservation.
Solar panels over California canals test possible joint-siting benefits
A $20 million investment from the state will assess whether a research paper’s conclusions pan out in real life.www.asce.org
There are numerous opportunities nationally without clear cutting land or buying up golf courses. Seems to me the big game changer would be if the solar roof tiles like Tesla is doing become cost competitive and the standard for most homes.