Snowfall totals, statistical "massaging", and the truth....anyone ?
I notice Stowe's website claims "Annual Snowfall 333 inches". While the 'bush claims annual snowfall totals of 262". I realize you can statistically "nudge" true snowfall facts in just about any direction.....but I was under the impression (recall somewhere in the recesses of the much abused gray matter) that the 'Bush/Glen received about equal to Stowe/Smuggs, if not historically a touch more of the white frosting. Something to do with the barren plain west of the 'bush, and the storms bumping into the ridge from Lincoln to Stark and dropping that "little extra" due to those conditions or somesuch. Just didn't think Stowe outpaced the valley quite so dramatically. Is Stowe's PR department working overtime, or measuring inches in a different way ? Hmmm...suddenly I got curious.
Am I skiing frozen crud with this thinking ? Anyone ?
I notice Stowe's website claims "Annual Snowfall 333 inches". While the 'bush claims annual snowfall totals of 262". I realize you can statistically "nudge" true snowfall facts in just about any direction.....but I was under the impression (recall somewhere in the recesses of the much abused gray matter) that the 'Bush/Glen received about equal to Stowe/Smuggs, if not historically a touch more of the white frosting. Something to do with the barren plain west of the 'bush, and the storms bumping into the ridge from Lincoln to Stark and dropping that "little extra" due to those conditions or somesuch. Just didn't think Stowe outpaced the valley quite so dramatically. Is Stowe's PR department working overtime, or measuring inches in a different way ? Hmmm...suddenly I got curious.
Am I skiing frozen crud with this thinking ? Anyone ?